George Neuner wrote on 01/10/2016 02:22 AM:
Why would they break anything? Section 5.1.1 of RFC-2046 says:
By "boundary string" I meant what that RFC section calls "boundary
parameter value". Putting leading "-" in there is just asking for
trouble, for no reason.
Not asking for trouble for
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:32:19 -0500, Neil Van Dyke
wrote:
>Also, I would not put leading "-" characters in the part boundary
>string, even if it doesn't break any servers you test against. I would
>use only alphanumeric ASCII characters.
Why would they break anything? Section 5.1.1 of RFC-20
Hi all,
I was just about to start encoding my forms as formlets when I remembered that
there are templates for web development. Do people advise using templates over
x-expressions for web development with Racket, that is, what are most people
using who do that kind of thing? After rereading it,
Here's an initial pull request: https://github.com/takikawa/tr-pfds/pull/6
It runs John's test case in about 2 ms, instead of multiple seconds.
Sam
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I gave this a try here: https://github.com/rfindler/tr-pfds but got stuck.
>
> Robby
>
>
> O
Yes, I was testing 6.3.0.13. Sorry for the noise.
On sábado, 9 de enero de 2016 17:39:02 (CET) Matthew Flatt wrote:
>The snapshots from Utah should be configured that way already, at least
>in the most recent snapshots (6.3.0.14). Were you looking at an older
>build? If not, can you say more about
The snapshots from Utah should be configured that way already, at least
in the most recent snapshots (6.3.0.14). Were you looking at an older
build? If not, can you say more about where you're seeing non-HTTPS
URLs?
At Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:45:52 +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> Can yo
Matthew writes:
> Repeated application of `string-split` is my secret weapon.
(filter (curryr string-prefix? "[X]") (string-split str "\n"))
To say nothing of string-prefix? (new in 6.3) and curryr - nice!
Somewhat more explicit (and verbose) variations:
(filter (λ (line) (string-prefix? line
Oh, I see the alternative solution for #1.
https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/pull/288
Your discussion there is delightful.
Thanks.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Yes, right. This is why I suggested drdr.
>
> Robby
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Sam Tobin-Hoc
Can you change also the snapshots in utah.edu to access to the catalog
with https? The server supports https.
On 09/01/16 04:54, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Sam, Ryan, I, and others have been moving Racket services to HTTPS:
https://racket-lang.org/
We're changing all references to use HTTPS, so
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Alex Knauth wrote:
>
>> On Jan 9, 2016, at 1:38 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>>
>> Related question: Perl has a capacity to change your delimiters on
>> regexen in order to avoid having to backwhack everything.
>
> [...]
>
> And you can do this:
> #lang at-exp racket
>
Greetings.
Consider the following:
#lang typed/racket
;#lang typed/racket/no-check ; <-- this works as expected
(: func (case->
([#:as (U Integer False)] -> Any)
(Integer [#:as (U Integer False)] -> Any)))
(define (func (arg1 #f) #:as (opt-arg #f)
I gave this a try here: https://github.com/rfindler/tr-pfds but got stuck.
Robby
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> I think we must be talking past each other. Let me try to back out a bit.
>>
>> It is my unde
Yes, right. This is why I suggested drdr.
Robby
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> We do run the core racket tests without exflonums on Travis; you can
> see an example here:
> https://travis-ci.org/racket/racket/jobs/101270780
>
> Unfortunately, building all of Racket
In TravisCI, building with the "main-distribution" packge, the
versions in linux that don't have "--disable-jit" finish corretly just
a minutes after an hour. (I think the official max time is 1 hour, but
apparently there are some bonus minutes.)
The versions with "--disable-jit" take longer and a
We do run the core racket tests without exflonums on Travis; you can
see an example here:
https://travis-ci.org/racket/racket/jobs/101270780
Unfortunately, building all of Racket + everything else takes more
time that various hosted CI systems allow. If there was a build of
Racket without extflonu
Could this problem be helped if we run something like drdr, but in
more configurations? (That doesn't seem particularly simple, tho.)
Robby
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:34:45 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> At Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:58:00 +0800, WarGr
At Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:34:45 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:58:00 +0800, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju wrote:
> > 1. Could you please treat the exn:fail:unsupported like a normal case as if
> > it is wrapped by (eval:error)?
> >
> >
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/type-ref.ht
> ...and extract the following strings:
> "[X] Escape with Inoue-sensei"
> "[X] Forget all these disloyal options and stick with Shikigami-sensei's
> plan"
> What method would you suggest for that?
There's nothing wrong with `regexp-whatever`. But because Racket has so
many good tools for list pr
At Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:58:00 +0800, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju wrote:
> 1. Could you please treat the exn:fail:unsupported like a normal case as if
> it is wrapped by (eval:error)?
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/type-ref.html#%28form._%28%28lib._type
> d-racket%2Fbase-env%2Fbase-types..rkt%2
1. Could you please treat the exn:fail:unsupported like a normal case as if
it is wrapped by (eval:error)?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/type-ref.html#%28form._%28%28lib._typed-racket%2Fbase-env%2Fbase-types..rkt%29._.Ext.Fl.Vector%29%29
this example is about ExtFlVector which is not s
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 1:38 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> Related question: Perl has a capacity to change your delimiters on regexen
> in order to avoid having to backwhack everything.
The raw-string package allows this for strings:
#lang raw-string/raw-string racket #\$
(pregexp $"\d") ; #px"\
21 matches
Mail list logo