> On Oct 13, 2017, at 18:52, Geoffrey Knauth wrote:
>
> Maybe do undisputedly?-evil name-mangling now to get things working,
> then become a saint with a better solution down the road. Sometimes
> I don't realize how to do something the "good" way until I've traveled
> down the path of doing it
What a pity to live so far away (Buenos Aires, Argentina) from such
interesting events...
But at least I would have the chance to watch the livestreams ! Thanks for
sharing them !
El sábado, 14 de octubre de 2017, 3:23:15 (UTC-3), Jack Firth escribió:
>
> This is really cool, thanks for writing
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Luis Marcelo Rosso wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am porting the Prolog interpreter shown in Peter Norvig's classic text on
> AI, "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common
> Lisp 1st Edition",
> https://www.amazon.com/Paradigms-Artific
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Ran Mackeson wrote:
>
> Htdp and Racket have given me much enjoyment. I have just started to play
> with racket gui. My Racket version is 6.10.1 and on both Linux Mint 17 and
> Ubuntu 16.04 the behaviour of 'iconize' puzzles me:
>
> #lang racket/gui
>
> (defin
Lovely! I was thinking along these lines, but you hit it out of the park.
Sounds like you must be avoiding some really important task!
John
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 11:31, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2017 05:01 AM, George Neuner wrote:
>> On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
> > Racket doesn't play well with existing code bases (except C things)
> > and so my hypothesis is simply that to gain adoption of Racket, you
> > need to solve problems that aren't in the "production path." Good
> > thing there are *lots* of those! All those Python scripts you have?
> > Al
On 10/14/2017 05:01 AM, George Neuner wrote:
On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate
caller?
Some reflective capability that I haven't yet discover
Htdp and Racket have given me much enjoyment. I have just started to play
with racket gui. My Racket version is 6.10.1 and on both Linux Mint 17 and
Ubuntu 16.04 the behaviour of 'iconize' puzzles me:
#lang racket/gui
(define frame
(new frame%
[label "Example"]
[width 400]
Am 13.10.2017 um 00:20 schrieb Andrew Gwozdziewycz:
> Racket doesn't play well with existing code bases (except C things)
> and so my hypothesis is simply that to gain adoption of Racket, you
> need to solve problems that aren't in the "production path." Good
> thing there are *lots* of those! All
On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate
caller?
Some reflective capability that I haven't yet discovered?
I'm not sure if there's a way to do that
>
> So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
> functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate caller?
> Some reflective capability that I haven't yet discovered?
>
I'm not sure if there's a way to do that, but I'm wondering if what you
want to do can
11 matches
Mail list logo
