`br-parser-tools` has some patches needed to make `brag` work, e.g., using the
srcloc structure. I forked rather than patch the underlying `parser-tools`
package because I didn't want to destroy the fragile ancient artifact. I fixed
a few bugs; the others persist. I notice, for example, that
Thanks for confirming. I had actually started with the lexer-src-pos version
but had other problems like exn:fail:read wanting a list of srclocs and the
lexer only having positions. So I switched to lexer-srcpos which fixed the
exception but broke the parse. Maybe I should do a conversion
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 8:36 PM jon stenerson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't understand the error message here. The parser seems to be
> looking for a position-token but the lexer is sending srcloc-tokens? Is
> there a simple fix? Using Racket 7.7 on WIn 10.
Hi Jon,
Yes, you're right, and there
Hi all,
I don't understand the error message here. The parser seems to be
looking for a position-token but the lexer is sending srcloc-tokens? Is
there a simple fix? Using Racket 7.7 on WIn 10.
I am also confused about whether to use br-parser-tools or parser-tools
package. br-* is the more
On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 6:11:37 PM UTC+8, Yury Bulka wrote:
>
> Wow, from 695 requests per second to 49,516 is a huge improvement!
>
> Since we were comparing to django previously, it's now much closer with
> django (which does 78,132 rps.)
>
I know very little about web development, so
Hi Catonano
Did you resolve this
Kind regards
Stephen
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 9:16:14 AM UTC, Catonano wrote:
>
> Hi,
> in Guile there are some modules inspired by Andy Wingos paper:
> "applications of fold to xml transformation"
>
> In Guile these concepts are used not only for xml
Yury Bulka writes:
> Wow, from 695 requests per second to 49,516 is a huge improvement!
>
> Since we were comparing to django previously, it's now much closer with
> django (which does 78,132 rps.)
I expect the Racket benchmark will do even better on TechEmpower's hw
than it did on mine
Hello,
Please, find below the final call for draft papers for IFL 2020.
Please forward these to anyone you think may be interested.
Apologies for any duplicates you may receive.
best regards,
Jurriaan Hage
Publicity Chair of IFL
Thank you Bogdan!
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:39 PM Bogdan Popa wrote:
> Small update on this: I've updated the benchmarks to run multiple Racket
> processes with an Nginx load balancer in front. After some tuning[1], here
> is what the results look like on my 12 core AMD Ryzen 9 3900 server:
>
>
Wow, from 695 requests per second to 49,516 is a huge improvement!
Since we were comparing to django previously, it's now much closer with
django (which does 78,132 rps.)
Django also does run multiple worker processes (3 per cpu):
10 matches
Mail list logo
