[racket-users] Re: European Racketeers and conferences

2017-08-24 Thread luis.osa.gdc
Hi all, I live in Stockholm. Using Racket for pet projects. I would also love to see a meetup or get-together happen on this side of the Atlantic. Best, Luis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [racket-users] eval:check and floating-point precision

2016-11-27 Thread luis.osa.gdc
Thanks, Pierpaolo, but wouldn't that also render as documentation? I don't want to show an example where (good-enough (t-test ...) ) is documented, I just want (t-test ...) to show up to the user. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users"

Re: [racket-users] How to test that a file is syntactically correct, but don't run it

2016-11-26 Thread luis.osa.gdc
Some weeks ago, I just had the exact same problem while developing a "server.rkt" module with Vim. I use the Syntactic plugin to check syntax, and this plugin in turn uses the `racket` executable to find syntax problems. My solution was to add the args "--load" when executing the module with

[racket-users] eval:check and floating-point precision

2016-11-26 Thread luis.osa.gdc
Hi, everyone! I am writing a simple statistical package for Racket, and I would like to have tests within my Scribble documentation (as well as Rackunit tests in the implementation modules). For the Scribble tests, I am using `eval:check`. But I have noticed that the tests do not pass unless