Sage Gerard wrote on 9/19/19 10:47 AM:
To add color: A prior supervisor said "if it's famous, we should use it."
[...]
If you want to appear among the first results, just present your work using
language that matches nothing else.
If I could briefly return the favor of color, by connecting
> different tools tend to be considered unproven or inadequate.
To add color: A prior supervisor said "if it's famous, we should use it."
Adoption is often confused with maturity. Corporate politics follows high
school rules more than we'd like to admit.
> there seems to be what has the
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
>
> This question is more for private-sector programmers in firms using
> well-adopted technologies: How many of you tried to get your team to try
> Racket at work for smaller tasks? What was their reaction?
Three of them use it because they
I'll assert that Racket is currently for a subset of the people who are
allowed to choose whatever tools they want: academics, hobbyists, people
developing small tools for individual use (like sysadmins did with
Perl), and... some startups. Most organizations, you can't choose any
tools you
This question is more for private-sector programmers in firms using
well-adopted technologies: How many of you tried to get your team to try Racket
at work for smaller tasks? What was their reaction?
I know there are not enough Racket programmers out there to justify many risks
in maintaining
5 matches
Mail list logo
