Great work and copious thanks to Rob & Alex!
Just wanted to add that the automated testing already prevented us from
releasing a buggy version of falsecolor yesterday, so Huzzah for the new
facility!
-Greg
> From: "Guglielmetti, Robert"
> Date: January 16, 2018 11:35:39 AM PST
>
> I am delig
Hi German,
You cannot access two different scenes/octrees from the same process, so no use
in having different ambient files.
Again, it's a limitation in the design of the renderers and their use of global
data structures.
You need to spawn separate processes if you want to render multiple scene
Hi Sarith,
That's a good idea. I just didn't think of it. I'll figure out an appropriate
option and check it in.
Best,
-Greg
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Sarith Subramaniam wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Is it advisable to replicate the workflow for bsdfview in a non-interacti
OK. I'll have to fix that...
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Nathaniel Jones wrote:
>
> Ok, this gives the orientation I would expect, but the left and right eye
> views are now switched. Probably and artifact of reversing the azimuth
> direction...
>
> Nathaniel
>
>> On Su
Hi Terrance,
It's remarkable that you were able to sort this out without aid.
There's already a fairly sophisticated installation script written for trad,
which gets triggered by "rmake install" in the src/util directory. I wouldn't
know how to replicate this using cmake, unless it can call th
The bug seems to be an intermittent problem with the system select() call, for
which there is no substitute. Almost all multiprocessing methods in Radiance
rely on it. It's difficult to investigate as the main process hangs in the
system call and there is no way to determine why except by puttin
Agreed -- thread now moved to radiance-dev list. (Andrei, you can sign up for
this list if you aren't already at .)
That's a good idea to use unsigned integersh, Nathaniel. I've also suggested
(in a private message to Andrei) that he try it with "long long" in place of
"long," as I think the
Thanks, Joe.
This probably belongs on the "dev" mailing list, so will cross-post there and
you can sign up and respond on that list if you don't mind.
None of these warnings generated the "There were some errors." conclusion at
the end. This was caused by a failed "clean" operation that didn
Redirecting the input works better on both Windows and Unix than cat, to my
earlier point.
-Greg
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:58 PM, "Randolph M. Fritz" wrote:
> Rob Guglielmetti writes:
>
>>
>> I am silly. This vestigial code is still in OpenStudio, for "Radiance
> Classic" cal
Hi Aitor,
This question probably belongs on the radiance-dev list, so I am cross-posting
there and ask you to sign up (if you haven't already) and respond on that list.
(Same goes for others -- thanks!)
The data order in the file is a matrix running from smallest to largest Klems
patches, wit
Perhaps this link can help:
http://ghostbusters.en.softonic.com/
It's supposed to work on Windows, but maybe it will work for luminaires, too.
Cheers,
-Greg
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Axel Jacobs wrote:
> Pally,
>
> I just ran your model on a LINUX box. Here is s
>> will benefit users of the OpenStudio SDK and applications, as well as
>> anyone interested in using the powerful raytracing software but reluctant
>> to learn how to compile code.
>
>> Working with Greg Ward and Kitware, we have modified the Radiance source
>> t
Hi Fritz,
The usual strategy is to convert to Radiance format, like obj2rad. I don't
know how often it's used, but the .OBJ format has a NURBS specification,
and it should be easy enough to support it with obj2mesh. That would have
the advantage of including surface normal smoothing and uv textu
This post really belongs on the developer's list, so I'm cross-posting. Please
subscribe to that if you haven't already and respond there.
You should not compile rvu if you have no output device to use with it. You
can take it out of the dependencies in the src/rt/Rmakefile, and avoid the
pro
Thanks, Jack. Any idea how portable Linux binaries are? Does it make
sense to share them with others on the main site?
-Greg
(cross-posting to dev mailing list)
From: Jack de Valpine
Date: March 29, 2010 1:07:55 PM CDT
Hi All,
I just wanted to report that Radiance 4.0 compiled with no p
Yes, I compiled under 10.5 (Leopard) this time. Perhaps there's a way
to back-link it to a version that's supported on earlier OS releases?
(Let's this discussion to the dev list.)
-Greg
From: Randolph Fritz
Date: March 17, 2010 9:35:17 PM PDT
X11 wasn't installed on all versions of Mac
16 matches
Mail list logo
