There is a 'time' command in Windows! No need to install anything!
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TIME_(command)
There even is a nice time bat-file on Stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/673523/how-to-measure-execution-time-of-command-in-windows-command-line
To run Mark Stock
Of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow G20
0SP
Email Disclaimer
-Original Message-
From: Axel Jacobs [mailto:jacobs.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June 2013 16:48
To: radiance-dev@radiance-online.org
Subject: Re: [Radiance-dev] Mark Stock's benchmark on native Windows Radiance
I have benchmarked Relux
I favor xform with no options for this job; if the system has Radiance, I
expect it will have xform, regardless of what other commands are or are
not available. But, YMMV.
Randolph
___
Radiance-dev mailing list
Radiance-dev@radiance-online.org
Redirecting the input works better on both Windows and Unix than cat, to my
earlier point.
-Greg
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Randolph M. Fritz randolph...@panix.com wrote:
Rob Guglielmetti rob.guglielmetti@... writes:
I am silly. This vestigial code is still in
Greg, Randolph,
I admit that my use of cat is simply habit---I saw it once (probably
over 15 years ago) and never let go of it. I am actually not as savvy with
Unix as I am on TV.
By all means make the benchmark as portable as you can and send me the
changes. I will incorporate them as soon
I am silly. This vestigial code is still in OpenStudio, for Radiance Classic
calcs with a continuous sky:
catCommand = cat
if /mswin/.match(RUBY_PLATFORM) or /mingw/.match(RUBY_PLATFORM)
catCommand = type
end
system(#{catCommand} ./numeric/#{space_name}.map | rtrace #{rtrace_args} …)
In this
Mark,
I've seen lots of people use it, probably because it fits what people expect to
see in an inline command more than the stdin redirection. I think there are
even some examples in Rendering with Radiance using it, so you're in good
company...
Cheers,
-Greg
From: Mark Stock
Has anyone got this going?
(Yes! I have managed to get it built and installed. No, I have no idea
if it is actually working. More, later, when I've tested the thing.)
Randolph
___
Radiance-dev mailing list
Radiance-dev@radiance-online.org
Side note on the use of !cat I often see things like this:
!cat input1.rad input2.rad | xform -ry 20
Which is completely silly. Why not just use:
!xform -ry 20 input1.rad input2.rad
Even if you are going to a program that expects input on stdin, you can
redirect it instead:
!fussy_program
I am pleased to be able to say that, in fact, I ran a successful simulation.
My hasty hack compilations of libtiff 3.9.7 (the last version 3 libtiff)
and zlib 1.2.8 also worked, which was nice to see.
Performance, well, not so good. It took 4219.9 wall clock seconds on a
fairly capable Xeon,
10 matches
Mail list logo
