Your mongrels should not be taking that much memory. Are you running
them in production mode? Also consider that unless your sites are
really heavily and frequently viewed, you may need only one mongrel per
site.
Sean
Nancy Carroll wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I am trying to figure out how to
Sean Cribbs schrieb:
Your mongrels should not be taking that much memory. Are you running
them in production mode? Also consider that unless your sites are
really heavily and frequently viewed, you may need only one mongrel per
site.
Sean
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your answer. Hmmm. Yes,
On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Daniel Sheppard wrote:
I've taken the approach of having a separate table mapping urls to
page numbers and a file not found behaviour that performs
redirects for old mappings (I also trawl through my server logs for
404s and correct any repeated spelling
Hi,
I'd be quite interested if there was any way to reduce memory usage too,
here's the details for a couple of mongrel clusters, both of these are
running on a 256MB slices from slicehost so memory usage is a bit of a
concern, especially as neither of these sites have been made live and have
I know nothing about Mongrel, and I've never looked at the memory
footprint of Radiant running anywhere
But, just based on what I know about what Radiant DOES, it shouldn't
really be taking up that much more memory than any other rails app,
right?
Here's my thinking:
If you're not doing
Hi All,
I put together a simple email form this morning, and everything
worked great. But one issue I ran into is that the From: header is
static, and there was no way to even set the Reply-To: header either.
My form is a simple contact system, and I wanted to make it easy to
respond to
(Note that I also had to have a custom index page so that it could
look at my custom file not found type).
Wouldn't something like this in core be better? (COMPLETELY UNTESTED)
- 8 -
Index: page.rb
===
---
I've taken the approach of having a separate table mapping urls to
page numbers and a file not found behaviour that performs
redirects for old mappings (I also trawl through my server
logs for
404s and correct any repeated spelling mistakes / truncations) -
I've left it as a
Are you sure that's what subclasses_of does? I know that
there's definitely a method on ActiveRecord::Base that
keeps track of
subclasses as their created - maybe it's called something
else - descendants maybe? - I can't remember, but I'm pretty sure it
exists.
lounge groggy #
