Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:39 PM, john muhl wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jim Gay wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund >> wrote: >>> >>> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote: >>> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. >>> >>> It just felt right af

Re: [Radiant] Re: asset_gallery errors on radiant 0.9.1

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
Thanks for finding this. It's actually a bug with the content entered by the extension owner. The git repository was listed as "git://github.com:sbmsuite..." whereas that colon should be (and now is) a slash "git://github.com/sbmsuite..." Try installing it again and let me know if that is the sam

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread john muhl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote: > I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and > have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more.  The 'radiant' gem would that sounds like a fine idea; and has been discussed in the past but it wasn't particularly feasible u

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread john muhl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund > wrote: >> >> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote: >> >>> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. >> >> It just felt right after following the github discussion :-) >> >>> >>> On Tue, Ju

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jeff Casimir
> But you're right, with extensions as gems, this is much easier and no > matter what decision is made about what goes into radiant-more, it > will be very easy to make radiant-less, radiant-awesome, > radiant-whatever and write your own custom gem. >> Per my IgniteRailsconf talk, I will now be

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote: > I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and > have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more.  The 'radiant' gem would > become alias to radiant-more which would be core plus a few of the > most common extensions (SnS, som

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund wrote: > > On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote: > >> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. > > It just felt right after following the github discussion :-) > >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter >> wrote: >>> A qu

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jeff Casimir
I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more. The 'radiant' gem would become alias to radiant-more which would be core plus a few of the most common extensions (SnS, some kind of attachments, chronicle?, etc). Now that extensions

Re: [Radiant] restricted users

2010-06-29 Thread john muhl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Franky De Schampheleer wrote: > is there any extension for restricting users? > > for example a user that only access the pages ? the "normal" user (i.e. neither an admin or designer/developer) role ought to do that by default. for more sophisticated role setup i

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Marshal Linfoot wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Jim Gay wrote: >> >> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. >> ... >> Check out the prototype http://github.com/radiant/radiant-prototype > > Very nice! Can't wait to see this in a release soon. > I a

[Radiant] restricted users

2010-06-29 Thread Franky De Schampheleer
is there any extension for restricting users? for example a user that only access the pages ?

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Franky De Schampheleer
thanks :-) Op 30-jun-2010, om 00:39 heeft Marshal Linfoot het volgende geschreven: > After all the help I've received from the Radiant community, I'm glad I could > help someone else. Enjoy! > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Franky De Schampheleer > wrote: > great, that works fine ! > >

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Marshal Linfoot
After all the help I've received from the Radiant community, I'm glad I could help someone else. Enjoy! On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Franky De Schampheleer < fra...@decawebservices.be> wrote: > great, that works fine ! > > i used another radiant-gallery (same extension name, other author) > >

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Franky De Schampheleer
great, that works fine ! i used another radiant-gallery (same extension name, other author) many thanks ! franky Op 30-jun-2010, om 00:24 heeft Marshal Linfoot het volgende geschreven: > H... > > I went through the steps again to make sure and all is well. Here's what I > did: > > 1. c

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Marshal Linfoot
H... I went through the steps again to make sure and all is well. Here's what I did: 1. create a new radiant instance in folder "test" radiant test -d sqlite3 cd test rake production db:bootstrap [and chose 4. styled blog] 2. install gallery extension git clone git://githu

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Franky De Schampheleer
i have error with that one: rake production radiant:extensions:gallery:install (in /home/admin/radiant) rake aborted! Object is not missing constant GalleryItem! Op 30-jun-2010, om 00:03 heeft Marshal Linfoot het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM, decafranky wrote: > te

Re: [Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread Marshal Linfoot
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM, decafranky wrote: > tested a few gallery extensions but none is working > > which one do you prefere to install on 0.9.1 ? > This one is working fine on my 0.9 site: http://wiki.github.com/radiant/radiant/gallery-extension -- marshal

[Radiant] which gallery extension to use on 0.9.1?

2010-06-29 Thread decafranky
tested a few gallery extensions but none is working which one do you prefere to install on 0.9.1 ? gallery: migrate error: Object is not missing constant GalleryItem! galleries: installs ok, but editing a new created gallery has application errors (/admin/galleries/1/edit) (Change this error me

[Radiant] Re: asset_gallery errors on radiant 0.9.1

2010-06-29 Thread decafranky
tested also on 8.1 and worked fine it's 9.1 bug On Jun 28, 11:26 pm, decafranky wrote: > hi, > > I am a webdeveloper (php/mysql for now) and checking out more about > ruby and rails, > have found radiantcms and i am testing and exploring it now. Also > learning ruby & rails to contribute in the

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Marshal Linfoot
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. > ... > Check out the prototype http://github.com/radiant/radiant-prototype Very nice! Can't wait to see this in a release soon. I also want to say thank you to the developers/contributors to the Rad

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Joel Oliveira
My thoughts below On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund wrote: > > >> and with this comes another question: > >> > >> Ok, I know that Radiant is "different". And I love it. I recently did > >> a presentation in my web 2.0 community meeting about radiant. And one > >> statement burne

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Haselwanter Edmund
On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote: > I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. It just felt right after following the github discussion :-) > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter > wrote: >> A question for clarification: [ .. snippet .. ] >> wouldn't it be wise to

Re: [Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jim Gay
I'm glad you brought this up for discussion. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter wrote: > A question for clarification: > > I like to have options, but sometimes options are a bit confusing. > > On 29 Jun., 06:56, john muhl wrote: >> Jim (saturnflyer) and i have been working (mo

[Radiant] What is Radiant 1.0 and which Asset extension to use, was: page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Edmund Haselwanter
A question for clarification: I like to have options, but sometimes options are a bit confusing. On 29 Jun., 06:56, john muhl wrote: > Jim (saturnflyer) and i have been working (most of the important work > is Jim's) on a branch of page_attachments that adds some new interface > features to the

Re: [Radiant] page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread john muhl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Jeff Casimir wrote: > - It took me awhile to find the plus sign.  Maybe between the header > row and the attachments themselves there could be a "+ Add" that, when > clicked, could expand the form in place kinda like you do now. > Otherwise, I think it could slam t

Re: [Radiant] page_attachments interface enhancements

2010-06-29 Thread Jeff Casimir
John & Jim, >From testing out your heroku installed version, here are my thoughts: - It took me awhile to find the plus sign. Maybe between the header row and the attachments themselves there could be a "+ Add" that, when clicked, could expand the form in place kinda like you do now. Otherwise,