(RADIATOR) RE: Do you have an update to the dictionary

2002-11-14 Thread Karel van der Velden
Hello Hugh, Did you already receive the latest dictionary from Redback? I have the same statements in my logs. Regards, Karel van der Velden Hello -We don't have these definitions yet either, but I have copied this mail to Onno Becker at Redback who will send them to us I'm sure.Hi

Re: (RADIATOR) RE: Do you have an update to the dictionary

2002-11-14 Thread Toomas Kärner
VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Code 142 integer VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Msg 143 string - Original Message - From: Karel van der Velden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:02 AM

(RADIATOR) Auth using MD5

2002-11-14 Thread queksteven
I got an 3Com client that use the abovementioned. I only see the User ID but the password is BLANK. Am right to use the %P ? [This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should not copy or use

Re: (RADIATOR) IP Allocation from SQL

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Surajh - I will need to see a copy of your Radiator configuration file, together with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening with both authentication requests, and accounting starts and accounting stops. regards Hugh On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 07:57

Re: (RADIATOR) Auth using MD5

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello - Sorry - what is the question? Keep in mind that I will need to see a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) together with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening. regards Hugh On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 04:43 Canada/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

(RADIATOR) home again ....

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Everyone - I'm back! Flew in from Los Angeles yesterday and I'm trying to catch up, so if I have missed any questions, please send them again. regards Hugh -- Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000,

(RADIATOR) Radiator mailing list

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Everyone - Could everyone who sends mail to the Radiator mailing list, please follow these simple suggestions (it will save a lot of time). With every question, please include the following information: a clear description of the problem copy of the Radiator configuration file (no

Re: (RADIATOR) Removing a second Proxy State attribute.

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Eric - You could try a StripFromRequest, but check a trace 4 debug to make sure this doesn't break things. Otherwise, you will have to write a Hook (there are some examples in goodies/hooks.txt). regards Hugh On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 17:06 Canada/Eastern, Eric Hunter wrote: Is

(RADIATOR) Removing a second Proxy State attribute.

2002-11-14 Thread Eric Hunter
Is there an easy way to remove a second duplicate Proxy State attribute from a packet? (Its going through two proxies, and getting it in there twice is screwing things up on the final destination). Eric === Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/ Announcements on [EMAIL

RE: (RADIATOR) Session Limit Question

2002-11-14 Thread Chris Kay
Hugh is there a way i can use the results from Identifier CheckUser, in Identifier CheckGroup ect... So in the first authby if the user has a group of Techex can i use Techex in the Identifier CheckGroup authby EG: select * from online where group = $group (where $group = the result of the

Re: (RADIATOR) Session Limit Question

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Chris - You will need to include the results of the first AuthBy in the current request packet, in which you can check it in the following AuthBy. Ie. AuthBy SQL .. AuthSelect select PASSWORD, GROUP, . AuthColumnDef 0, Password, check AuthColumnDef 1, Group, request

Re: (RADIATOR) Removing a second Proxy State attribute.

2002-11-14 Thread Eric Hunter
Yeah, I tried that... and it strips out both of them :) I'll take a look at the hooks tomorrow, thanks for the tip :) Eric - Original Message - From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eric Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:25 PM

Re: (RADIATOR) Removing a second Proxy State attribute.

2002-11-14 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Jason Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:51:10 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 14 18:51:09 2002 Received: from

Re: (RADIATOR) Removing a second Proxy State attribute.

2002-11-14 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Jason, Hello Eric - This will work for the reply packet being sent back to the NAS, assuming that the Proxy-State attributes are identical. However, if you are in the middle of a chain of proxy servers, this may not be the correct solution. The radius RFC (2865) states that there can