Hello Jesús -
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jesús M Díaz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> when it is defined a pool, and it is used a 'subnetmask' different
> than '255.255.255.255', i think the ip addresses should not be
> assigned one by one, but 'n' by 'n', where 'n' was the number of ip
> addresses indicated by
Hi all,
when it is defined a pool, and it is used a 'subnetmask' different
than '255.255.255.255', i think the ip addresses should not be
assigned one by one, but 'n' by 'n', where 'n' was the number of ip
addresses indicated by 'subnetmask'.
an example:
Range 192.168.7.1 192.168.7.
Hello Valentin -
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Valentin Tumarkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Will 'AddressAllocator DHCP' be available in the near future ?
> Judging from the mailing list it has been any-time-now for a while
> already.
>
> (We are a systems integrator, and a couple of our existing customers wi
Hello,
Will 'AddressAllocator DHCP' be available in the near future ?
Judging from the mailing list it has been any-time-now for a while
already.
(We are a systems integrator, and a couple of our existing customers with
Radiator installations are considering moving to Funk Software StealBelted
