[RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
Hi guys I've just fixed a problem where requests coming in to our Radiator instance via IPv6 were not recognized. I did not configure the BindAddress paramater, which defaults to 0.0.0.0. So, this was the error. After reading up on the docs, I could not find a way to have it listen to all IPv6.

(RADIATOR) BindAddress question

2000-08-03 Thread Jason J. Horton
Is it possible to bind to more than one IP address per installation? -- -Jason J. Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fat Man in a Little Coat Intercom Online Inc. 212.376.7440 | http://www.intercom.com === Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/ Announcements o

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? > > > I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. goodies/ipv6.cfg BindAddress ipv6::: (this is basically saying, use ipv6: and bind to :: - like other daemons do) please note that you must use ipv6: as the prefix to ho

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
On 09/06/2011 12:48, Alan Buxey wrote: > Hi, > >> Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? >> >> >> I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. > > goodies/ipv6.cfg > > BindAddress ipv6::: > > (this is basically saying, use ipv6: and bind to :: - like other daemons >

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > So this should make it listen for all IPv4 and IPv6: > > BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: on Solaris thats certainly true > I heard that this might caused problems with Linux kernels? BindAddress 0.0.0.0 BindAddress ipv6::: that works on the few Linux boxes that I've tested alan _

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 01:56 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: > On 09/06/2011 12:48, Alan Buxey wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? >>> >>> >>> I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. >> >> goodies/ipv6.cfg >> >> BindAddress ipv6::: >> >> (this is basically sa

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > > BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: its horribly broken on Linux isnt it? on Solaris this works fine in this incantation. alan ___ radiator mailing list radiator@open.com.au http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 03:03 PM, Alan Buxey wrote: >>> BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: > > its horribly broken on Linux isnt it? on Solaris this works fine in this > incantation. Heh, I guess it can be said its broken, or this is just one posibility to do it. For those who are interested, see for example

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested various combinations: BindAddress 192.87.30.31,ipv6:2001:610:148:dead::31 I.e. hardcoded addresses - this works, both IPv4 and IPv6 clients work BindAddress ipv6::: IPv4 blocked (NOTICE: Request from unknown client 19

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, I can confirm exactly the same behaviour on Linux boxes here. hardcoded is the only way to have both working. Solaris can have both on single line and it works. a nice patch for 4.8 to arrive? :-) alan ___ radiator mailing list radiator@open.com.a

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 05:37 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: > Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested > various combinations: Thanks for the summary. > BindAddress 192.87.30.31,ipv6:2001:610:148:dead::31 > I.e. hardcoded addresses - this works, both IPv4 and IPv6 clients wo

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-14 Thread Alexander Hartmaier
Does this mean that we can't bind to IPv4 and IPv6 separately on Linux to not get v6 mapped v4 addresses? Am 2011-06-09 19:50, schrieb Heikki Vatiainen: > On 06/09/2011 05:37 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: >> Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested >> various combinatio

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-14 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/14/2011 11:45 AM, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: > Does this mean that we can't bind to IPv4 and IPv6 separately on Linux > to not get v6 mapped v4 addresses? I think the mapped addresses are only seen when a wildcard IPv6 bind is done. If you bind to a non-wildcard IPv4 or IPv6 address, you sho

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-14 Thread Alexander Hartmaier
Awesome reply Heikki, thanks! I recommend you add an IPv6 section to the pdf documentation including this! Am 2011-06-14 15:21, schrieb Heikki Vatiainen: > On 06/14/2011 11:45 AM, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: >> Does this mean that we can't bind to IPv4 and IPv6 separately on Linux >> to not get v6

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-28 Thread Dyonisius Visser
On 14/06/2011 15:21, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > Linux also has this special file to control the system wide behaviour: > > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only > If I do this to enable the option: > echo 1 |sudo tee /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only > > the same configuration works: > > BindAddress ipv6:::

Re: (RADIATOR) BindAddress question

2000-08-03 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Jason - On Fri, 04 Aug 2000, Jason J. Horton wrote: > Is it possible to bind to more than one IP address per installation? > No - but it is possible to run multiple copies of Radiator, each on a different IP address and/or port number. hth Hugh -- Radiator: the most portable, flexibl