Re: (RADIATOR) Bound IP

2002-05-01 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Tim - Yes, well that is the same conclusion that Mike and I came to as well. I think the best and simplest approach is to run multiple instances - one on each IP address, as you have described before. regards Hugh On Wed, 1 May 2002 13:19, Timothy G. Wells wrote: > Thanks! > > But I fou

ADDL INFO Re: (RADIATOR) Bound IP

2002-04-30 Thread Mike McCauley
h SMTP id g3UGFuo26554; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:15:56 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Timothy G. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADDL INFO Re: (RADIATOR) Bound IP Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:15:56 GMT X-Mailer: Endymion M

Re: (RADIATOR) Bound IP

2002-04-30 Thread Timothy G. Wells
Thanks! But I found an unfortunate issue with this. If I remove the BindAddress and let Radiator listen on all IP's then the answer comes back as 0.0.0.0. If I leave the BindAddress then it does say the correct IP but that doesn't help me in my attempt to prevent having multiple instances running

Re: (RADIATOR) Bound IP

2002-04-30 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Tim - You have access to both the source and destination: $p->{RecvFrom}; and $p->{RecvSocket}; Have a look at "Radius/Radius.pm", sub newRecvFrom. regards Hugh On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:45, Timothy G. Wells wrote: > Greetings, > > From within a hook, how would

RE: (RADIATOR) Bound IP

2002-04-30 Thread Ingvar Berg (ERA)
Hi Tim, You should use the BindAddress parameter in your radius config file to define this (note that the AuthBy RADIUS has its own binding, as its a client). /Ingvar > -Original Message- > From: Timothy G. Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: den 30 april 2002 14:45 > To