Your math for computing portidx isn't correct for more than the first 24
ports. If use the following instead, you'll get the correct results.
my $chan = $nas_port % 24;
my $slot = (($nas_port - $chan) / 24)+1;
my $portidx = (256*$slot) + $chan + 1000;
Note that these equations are
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for that. I have rolled your fix into the next release.
Cheers.
On Mar 28, 2:07am, Aaron Nabil wrote:
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) TotalControlSNMP
Your math for computing portidx isn't correct for more than the first 24
ports. If use the following instead, you'll get
I assume that 24 is for a T1 line, so with E1 lines it would be 30?
/Ingvar
-Original Message-
From: Mike McCauley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 29 mars 2000 03:27
To: Aaron Nabil; Stephen Roderick
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) TotalControlSNMP
Hi Aaron
bject: Re: (RADIATOR) TotalControlSNMP
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for that. I have rolled your fix into the next release.
Cheers.
On Mar 28, 2:07am, Aaron Nabil wrote:
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) TotalControlSNMP
Your math for computing portidx isn't correct for more than
t
Here a slightly improved version in that it should work independant of
the card density (quad/hiperdsp) and type (e1/t1). It uses the
session-id instead of the nas-port.
# Check Total Control by using SNMP
#
sub
Hi Aaron,
On Mar 28, 6:20am, Aaron Nabil wrote:
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) TotalControlSNMP
Here a slightly improved version in that it should work independant of
the card density (quad/hiperdsp) and type (e1/t1). It uses the
session-id instead of the nas-port.
Thanks again
