On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:08:42PM -0500, daniel wrote:
> Aug 16 17:59:41.898404 admin[25019]: [ 5] Can't read file
> /root/.razor/servers.discovery.lst: No such file or directory
> Aug 16 17:59:41.899061 admin[25019]: [ 5] Can't read file
> /root/.razor/servers.nomination.lst: No such file or di
Razor is now checking our server's outgoing mail. :)
At 8:09 this morning, a bunch of spam got through the outgoing
filter. If I report these to razor as spam, is there any risk
that my sending MTA (or the tag-line at the bottom of every
outgoing mail) will get listed in razor as more "spammy" s
Razor is now checking our server's outgoing mail. :)
At 8:09 this morning, a bunch of spam got through the outgoing
filter. If I report these to razor as spam, is there any risk
that my sending MTA (or the tag-line at the bottom of every
outgoing mail) will get listed in razor as more "spammy" s
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:40:34PM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
>
> Strange. Can you also connect to all the other servers?
>
> I'd also try to re-discovery by calling razor-admin -discover
>
> HTH.
>
Thanks for your help, I'll sort it out.
I'm not sure it's a Razor issue--I'm running R
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:17:05PM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> Looks like you are unable to connect on port 2703. Try telnet
> d1.cloudmark.com 2703 and see if you can go out. Perhaps
> you/your admin is blocking outgoing connections on port 2703.
pf is configured to allow all outgoing con
ime
Any idea what happened? The three other Courier Perl filter
processes happily went about their business while PID 41620 was
not working.
Regards,
--
Mark Bucciarelli
GAIA Host Collective, LLC
-
Using Tomcat but need to
ersions
of Perl on my system: one with ithreads, the other not).
2): Check your package base; you can do that by running the program below
(straight from the FAQ). That, at least, will give you an indication what is
really installed under what Perl.
- Mark
System Administrator Asa
Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 07:01 AM 9/1/2004, Mark wrote:
>
>> Should I perhaps ugrade my razor-agent.conf? It currently looks like
>> this (Autogenerated by Razor-Agents v2.22):
>
>
>
>> use_engines= 1,2,3,4
>> -
= 1,2,3,4
whitelist = razor-whitelist
--
I am currently using Razor-Agents v2.61.
Thanks,
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools
I know this is off-topic for this list; my apologies in advance. But does
someone know who at cloudmark.com I can ask a few questions about
rating.cloudmark.com?
Thanks,
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't ca
list, where the makers of SURBL
seem most active.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robot
you can amost cut the irony with a razor
blade...
- Original Message -
From:
Graciela Sharpe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:47
AM
Subject: [Razor-users] Remote-Control
Boats & Cars - Great Xmas Gifts.S
file.
I also ended up manually setting the IP address and now Razor works again.
So, it wasn't just you that this happened to.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ron E.
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROT
ever root), but as root. SA really should not run as root, and
probably does not, even. In that case, running "razor-admin -d -discover" as
the SA user may not have sufficient privileges to alter the discover files.
I run this from my crontab for roo
gratefully
received.
I am just a little worried that installing
the sdk has errfed up my Perl installation somehows...
Any help would be very gratefully
received.
cheers,
Mark.
boxes with this fix on them and haven't run into
a single problem with it yet...
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Hel
t make sure
> your firewall keeps state on port 2703 connections and it'll work.
Thank you; and all those others who responded. :) The keep-state thingy was
exactly what the doctor ordered, and fits in wonderfully well with the
FreeBSD ipfw syntax. :) I now set it up like this:
check-stat
what incoming ports do I need to open? It seems to come in on 2400 and
upward. Is there a known range?
Thanks!
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
something older than that then I'd try upgrading. The latest version
of GNU make is 3.80.
Mark.
On 2003-08-04 (Monday) at 14:19:27 +0200, Oliver von Quadt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am successfully running SpamAssassin and now wanted to add razor.
> However, I cna't even pass t
not be
affected. Am I correct in that assumption?
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-bu
file and I also installed the SDK package
which went fine. Can anyone help? Previous installs of Razor were
faultless.
Thanks in advance.
Mark
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An
rticular user account
has been lost. Is there anyway to reset the username or reregister it or
should I just continue with new usernames until I get it right?
Thanks,
--
Mark J. de Jong
,.,.,.,...,.,,.,..,.,,.,..,.,..,.,.,,.,...,..,,...
Senior Network Engineer - Secure Dog Hosting, Inc.
P.703
I (and doubtless many others) reported this as spam to razor, but it
doesn't show up in the databse. Has Cloudmark got server-side code to
prevent any razor-users email from being reported as spam? If so it's
understandable, but didn't help in this case
Mark.
On 2003-02-24
have said many times).
Mark.
On 2003-02-24 (Monday) at 13:04:12 -0500, Fox wrote:
> I used to reject mail at the SMTP level until my users were mysteriously
> getting de-subscribed from mailing lists. Good list admins will dump
> subscribers they can't deliver to, so if someone Raz
On 2003-02-24 (Monday) at 03:31:21 -0500, rODbegbie wrote:
> Mark Sheppard wrote:
> > This is something I was wondering about a while back but never got
> > round to asking - can you pre-emptively revoke messages, or does
> > revoking only work once there's been submiss
e-emptively revoke messages, or does
revoking only work once there's been submissions? A couple of
announcement mailing lists I'm on occasionally get a false positive
every now and then and I was thinking of writing some procmail rules
to auto-revoke every mail from them. Would this always be
al
with from an admin point of view, and I imagine that many others have
discovered this and are doing likewise. I never silently discard
email because then no-one knows it's a problem. By rejecting
hopefully someone somewhere will see that there's a problem and do
something about it.
Ma
where multiple of the same
systems keep each other in check. :)
In the meantime, spreading out the risk will have to do. And, as so many
simple solutions, that works actually pretty well.
Kind regards,
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to underst
spam. So is the fuzzy matching getting the text parts?
Maybe I should download a copy of this "IncrediMail" thing and do some
tests, but I'm not sure I could stomach it.
Mark.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceFor
All is fine now. It started working for me on Friday.
Thanks,
Mark.
On 2003-01-22 (Wednesday) at 18:15:44 -0800, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I've identified the problem... Working on fixing it now. If you provide a
> username on the command line of razor-register
opefully it'll work soon, I'll
keep trying
Mark.
On 2003-01-22 (Wednesday) at 10:29:56 +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
>
> Razor 2 got backported for Debian Woody by a Debian developper.
> (it is not included in the official distribution, of course)
>
> You can fi
ng from hubris.cloudmark.com
It looks like it connected OK, but then hubris.cloudmark.com stopped
talking to me. Does anyone know what the problem is? Is it a server
problem or a configuration problem at my end?
Cheers,
Mark.
On 2003-01-21 (Tuesday) at 13:27:48 -0800, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
>
s spam?
Thanks,
Mark
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
33 matches
Mail list logo
