Re: [Razor-users] URGENT: difficulties with razor + spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Samuel Checker
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote: > That is quite strange. Does this machine have DNS access? I'd manually > replace the server with the new IP "66.151.150.11", if other things > don't help. > Well, the manual replacement worked for me as well (see the thread Another Discovery problem).

[Razor-users] Another discovery problem

2003-11-07 Thread Samuel Checker
I read the message a few days ago about a problem with running a good copy of Razor - I've been seeing the same thing. It appears to be dying during discovery, with the error Nov 07 08:15:52.089848 check[7699]: [ 8] already have 1 discovery servers Nov 07 08:15:52.090152 check[7699]: [ 8] Checking

Re: [Razor-users] EFF's response to Adam Goryachev

2003-02-28 Thread Samuel Checker
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > One of our board members - John Gillmore - (If you've heard of the "alt" > news groups - John started alt and is one of the founders of EFF.) - That's nothing, I invented pants. > > John says: > > Our stated policy is that antispam measures' first goal sh

Re: [Razor-users] Re: Razor Censoring EFF's Newsletter

2003-02-28 Thread Samuel Checker
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > Except that EFF is not spam. The burden of proof is on Razor. You have > to show me that is the reason it was listed. If you can't then you are > merely guessing. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -

Re: [Razor-users] How to game razor as a censorship tool

2003-02-27 Thread Samuel Checker
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > Tell me if this wouldn't work. I have no idea if it would. > > > S0 - should I set this up and test it? I could start with the White House > mailing list and the Republican National Committee. Shall we do an experiment or > should we fix the problem? If

Re: [Razor-users] Turning Razor into a censorship tool

2003-02-24 Thread Samuel Checker
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > Thanks. I don't know if it's the government or just someone making a > mistake. On scenereo is someone comes home from vacation and finds 1500 > emails waiting of which 90% is spam. As they delete and flag it as spam > the accidently hit the EFF newsletter

Re: [Razor-users] files created in .razor

2003-01-08 Thread Samuel Checker
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sven wrote: > in your .procmailrc file try adding the DROPPRIVS=1 flag and make sure the > .razor directory is owned by the owner. This will create the new files using > the users' permissions/ownership > > Sven > Worked perfectly, Sven. Let me know if you want me to have your

[Razor-users] files created in .razor

2003-01-08 Thread Samuel Checker
At the moment I have no central razorhome, and in fact I've grown to like having each user have his own .razor directory, log, etc. The only problem that I am seeing is one that I am sure is related to my own newbieness but hopefully it is one for which folks can provide a quick answer. Razor is b

Re: [Razor-users] what is spam

2002-10-31 Thread Samuel Checker
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Ed Hennis wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, 10:01pm (-), Sean Rima wrote: > > > As he says, he has asked them to stop sending him what is unsolicited > > Commercial email, ie spam or UCE. I say report it. > > I agree, but with the caveat that he must be absolutely certain that

[Razor-users] what is spam

2002-10-30 Thread Samuel Checker
I'm hesitant to report this one message considering that it may cause revokes to be issued. But a major online travel service has ignored my requests to stop sending me their advertisements that I never asked for. Should this be reported? ---

Re: [Razor-users] Razor and Pine

2002-10-09 Thread Samuel Checker
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brian Fahrlander wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:15:03 -0400 (EDT), Samuel Checker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've been testing Razor, invoked from sendmail/procmail and so far it > > seems pretty copacetic. Last night's spam to the l

[Razor-users] Razor and Pine

2002-10-09 Thread Samuel Checker
I've been testing Razor, invoked from sendmail/procmail and so far it seems pretty copacetic. Last night's spam to the list provided a good test - the spam itself as well as several of the responses were flagged, as other list members reported. This morning I piped the messages out from pine, bei