It would be helpful to get razor-check -H output from one or more of
these mails. I can investigate on the backend.
Cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Rudd
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 2:39 PM
To: John Andersen
Cc: razo
output for the
mails you are trying to whitelist and we'll be able to tell you what's going on
and how to fix it.
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 1/2/2007 5:50 AM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash; r
SHA1 sig is not used in the newer versions of Razor. Did you try listing the
ehash?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
Sent: Mon 1/1/2007 9:14 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor-check
Chris,
If they don't contain the original spam message, the content of the bounce
messages itself is most likely to be contested. I get ~20K of these everyday as
a lot of spammers will use @vipul.net in from addresses. Razor will get the
ones that have the original attached, but not the ones
Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 6:24 PM
To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] e8 listings, how much revoke does it take?
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 17:20, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> The volume of reports for the domain does indicate poor
> mailing pra
Hi John and Matt,
According to Razor's metrics, this domain is considered to be
"contested" - ie. there is disagreement on the desirability of mail that
includes links to the domain. Contested translates into "pass through"
or "legit". The volume of reports for the domain does indicate poor
maili
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006
10:48 AMTo: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.netCc: Vipul
Ved Prakash Subject: RAZOR REPORT -
ERROR 2003- I want contributing to fight SPAM !Importance:
High
I can't understand this error mes
006 2:34 PM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash
Cc: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Unable to connect, operation in progress
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:17:05PM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> Looks like you are unable to connect on port 2703. Try telnet
> d1.cloudmark.com 2
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Unable to connect, operation in progress
Mark,
Looks like you are unable to connect on port 2703. Try telnet d1.cloudmark.com 2703 and see if you can go out. Perhaps you/your admin is blocking outgoing connections on port 2703.
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Reporting known spam
Hi,
Razor uses a trust metric to assign reputations to reporters. New reporters
start at 0 and have to build up trust by exhibiting agreement with existing
trusted reporters. This protects against various forms of "ballot stuffing"
attacks that s
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Java Razor Client
Cool!
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jörg Zieren
Sent: Wed 8/2/2006 12:42 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Razor-users] Java Razor Client
Dear all,
this may be of interest to some:
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Is there a version of Vipul's Razor forWindowsServer?
I know that a few people have managed to get Razor2 to run on Windows under Cygwin.
My company, Cloudmark, makes various products for Windows that are based on Razor2 network and technology. These might work for
Title: Mailing List Admin
Hi,
If anyone would like to assume the responsibility of mailing list administrator (reviewing post by non-members), please send me mail.
cheers,
vipul
___
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
ht
Title: Mailing List Admin
Hi,
If anyone would like to assume the responsibility of mailing list administrator (reviewing post by non-members), please send me mail.
cheers,
vipul
___
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
ht
I am not an authority on this, but afaict you shouldn't have to modify
or recompile smrazor.c.
Cheers,
Vipul
> -Original Message-
> From: Sampei02 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:36 AM
> To: Vipul Ved Prakash; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: [Razor-users] RELEASE: razor-agents 2.82
My mistake. The web pages have been updated with the correct link.
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 5/31/2006 8:08 AM
To: K. S.
Cc: Vipul Ved Prakash; razor-users
Folks,
The version 2.82 of Razor Agents is now available for download from
http://razor.sf.net/. This version fixes some long standing bugs in the
discovery and TCP connect() logic. The agents always connect to the
correct servers now. If this release proves to be stable, we expect to
begin the
Title: RE: /tmp/ LOG files
I believe an older version of agents did that. Are you running 2.81?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sun 5/28/2006 11:19 PM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: razor-users
Title: RE: False positive : help !!
I have contested the particular fingerprint that was causing this FP. Is this fixed now?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/5/2006 3:37 AM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Please send me razor-check -H output of the messages and I
can investigate. It's impossible to figure out what's going on from your
description below.
cheers,
vipul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006
Folks,
I am pleased to announce that with the release of razor-agents
2.81[1] a new service policy has been introduced, that makes the
use of Razor2 service completely open and free. A license
introduced in 2003 restricted usage by third party integrators,
but the new license unencumbers all usage
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Attachment only emails raising razor
Yosi,
This should not happen. If it does, it's a FP. Can you give me razor-check -H output of a few attachment only messages?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
razor agents support SOCKS, so you should be able to use a
SOCKS server to proxy.
cheers,
vipul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sampei02Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:19 AMTo: Matt
KettlerCc: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
[
Folks,
For those of you who are interested, I have co-authored a paper on the
design of Razor2's trust metric (TeS) and overall architecture of the
Cloudmark backend. The paper is published in the November issue of ACM
Queue and is now on their website[1].
[1] (http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?
If that is the case, please send me razor-check -H output and I will
investigate.
Cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:09 PM
To: Kevin W. Gagel
Cc: Vipul Ved Prakash; Terry Griffin; razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Griffin
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:45 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] false positives with centos-announce list
>
> From: "Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PR
Title: RE: [Razor-users] false positives with centos-announce list
Terry,
Can you send me the signatures for this message? (razor-check -H)
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Terry Griffin
Sent: Mon 11/21/2005 8:47 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourc
Folks,
In the last few weeks I have received tons of mail from people asking me
if they are covered by Razor service policy. Here's some clarification.
The spirit of the service policy is to restrict usage from those
companies that are charging their customers in some way for use of razor
agents
Ved Prakash; razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] razor2 report failed
I don't see razor-agents v2.77 available for download from the
sourceforge site? The latest is shown as razor-agents v2.75, released
on 7-19-05.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Vip
You need to create a razor identity using "razor-report -register". The
new version of the agents (2.77), which was released a few days ago,
will automatically create an identity. It also fixes some bugs with
amavis integration, so I suggest that you upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: [E
Can you give me razor-check -H output for the word document mail?
Richard, could you look into the download issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin W.
Gagel
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:12 PM
To: Razor List
Subject: [Razor-users]
Folks,
Version 2.75 of Razor Agents is now available. You can download this
release from SourceForge at:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/razor/razor-agents-2.75.tar.bz2?downl
oad
This release addresses all remaining bugs and feature requests that have
been logged on SourceForge. Also couple
NS round robin. [Bug #604679]
* Remove the ICMP ping logic for finding the "fastest"
catalogue server; the configuration option for this logic
is now ignored. [Support #739464]
* Removed stale engine code for various signature types that
are no longer used.
ing logic for finding the "fastest"
catalogue server; the configuration option for this logic
is now ignored. [Support #739464]
* Removed stale engine code for various signature types that
are no longer used.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vip
Folks,
Many of you have written to me over the last few months about
the possibility of caching Razor signatures to avoid network
latency of Razor check. We've come up with a plan and I want
your feedback, specially if you are running Razor in a high-
volume environment like an ISP.
As you know,
d an increase in accuracy due to ehash being used
everytime.
- Fixed a bug in report by message. Version 2.61 would drop MIME
headers on certain spam messages which would cause the backend
to ignore these messages as malformed.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Si
Folks,
I have released version 2.66 of Razor Agents. This release improves
accuracy and provides privacy enhancements. I would urge everyone to
upgrade soon as possible. Here's the link to the tarball:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/razor/razor-agents-2.66.tar.gz?downlo
ad
Here's the chang
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Servers Down?
We are having some issues with the servers. The OPS team is on it.
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Eisner
Sent: Thu 9/9/2004 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Razor-users] Server
Title: RE: [Razor-users] What engine?
This was something of a design flaw (to store use_engines) in the config file, so 2.61 will override the use_engines in the config to insert engines 4 and 8.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John E Hein
Sent: Wed
o longer supported on the
backend. [Bug #975490]
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Sir, are you classified as human?"
"Uh, negative. I am a meat popsicle."
www.vipul.net
www.cloudmark.com
is happens.
Thanks for your continued paitence and support!
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp
www.vipul.net
nologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> ___________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
; Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> ___________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-u
Folks,
razor-users is a members only list from now on, at least till we can find
a better way to screen posts to the lists.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I hav
will induce less
network traffic. Please give it a test drive and let me know if you
encounter problems.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp
: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> __
--
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
> WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
>
Hi,
Those of you who have poked a whole in their firewall to
access Razor2 servers should note the IP changes to the
Razor2 servers. The new IP range is:
66.151.150.11 - 66.151.150.60
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "...not unpreced
commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL P
ownload today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> _______________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
age has a bug.
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visu
-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder &am
I've put up Razor Agents 2.35 with the Makefile.PL fix (and a couple of
other fixes) at:
http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/razor-agents-2.35.tar.gz
If you were having Makefile.PL related problems, please test this release
and let me know how it works.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Pr
There was a little problem with 2.35 just posted. Please try 2.36 posted
at the same location.
http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloud
r to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/
> >direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> >___
> >Razor-users mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
Yes. The restrictions only apply to those who are selling commercial
systems that integrate Razor agents.
cheers,
vipul
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:35:09PM +, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vipul Ved Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAI
As long as ISP does not publish commercial software that embeds Razor,
it's covered under personal usage.
cheers,
vipul
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:20:21PM -0700, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> At 01:35 PM 8/1/2003, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> >We now have a usage policy in place regard
.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
please ignore.
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
please ignore.
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
e added this to
the FAQ as well as the README which will go out with the next version of
razor-agents.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP
s and cool
down instead of taking pot shots at each other. Aggresion, in general,
is counter-productive and not welcome on this list.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distrib
Liudvikas,
Thanks for the debug log. I believe changing the average confidence to a
number between 10-20 would mitigate the problem with list related FPs
considerably. We will do some statistical analysis and compute a new
recommended confidence.
Also, SpamNet (Outlook) users usually have bette
John,
We had some DB issues (missing content in catalogues) over the last 2
weeks which could have caused the false positives with E*TRADE/Ebay
messages. We have fixed this problem 90%, and over the next couple of days
all the relevant data will be available in the catalogue servers.
Regarding m
David,
The reason your reports are not reflected immediately is because you don't
have enough trust in the system. Building up trust is an important
component of a collaborative system, because it's the only mechanism that
ensures we have a clean database for all to use. As a new user, it might
b
linking in
> the unix terminal.
>
> So, I tried to do 'razor-admin -register', but this time no file created
> and the process is never stopped again.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is h
start reporting spam I get a timeout. Here's the tail of the
> > > output from "razor-admin -d -register":
>
> [...]
>
>
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can&
--
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
>
nts
> v2.22. I am not experienced with interpreting the razor debug
> information, so I may be missing something obvious.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet
; ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's jus
f other ports
> that are open, so could I modify razor to use another port?
> Are the razor servers expecting tcp "ping" traffic on 4/tcp ? Does it
> matter if the port I use is open or closed on the receiving end?
>
> Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
>
> >Nope, they
you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your
> clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption.
> Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
> ___
> Razor-users ma
>
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGP 8.0
> Comment: This message has been digitally signed by Mike Loiterman
>
> iQA/AwUBPh31X2jZbUnRudGOEQLqRwCglxirDaEEDmZ9fzDCx5sXMdMSDLsAoKJW
> 75ljXxVReJgwDxy2Kj6jKGip
> =9FCe
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
st
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
latest client. If someone has a good example, please send my way.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is her
rry,
Please send me an example mail where you see the problem with 2.22
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://
ue (not reported by anyone else), it is purged from
the database.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design
gt;
> > > Note: Emails authored under this address do not reflect the opinions of my
> > > employer unless otherwise stated. Facts contained are also prone to human
> > > error. If either of these statements are
ined are also prone to human
> error. If either of these statements are not humanly obvious to you, I
> suggest careful thought before leaping to any other conclusions.
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
>
idence level of individual parts. I plan to add
a switch that simply returns the confidence.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:25:24PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> Suggested addition:
Thanks, I have added your submissions to the FAQ... they will be reflected
on the site in a day or two.
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Softwa
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:49:18AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> This is a question for the razor developers:
>
> Does my trust or the state of the system change in any way if I report
> the same spam message twice?
Nope.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is he
an file
> for razor-agent.conf? I thought it was in the man file at one point but
> I had to go to the source to figure out what the different methods did
> for 2.20.
I don't think it ever got added. I will add it in the next release.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
-
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
> Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTE
nce values of spam, so people can set local cf values.
> "What is a thousand times nothing much? Fast, then expel worms."
>-- http://paulm.com/toys/surrealism/
Cool toy. :-)
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it'
TECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program n
tity file to report spam?
You can't... I'd suggest using a derivative like [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
a username.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.ne
ould you send me the output of
razor-check -d?
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:29:27PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> > Hmm. After untarring the distribution, go into the Razor2-Preproc-deHTML
> > dir and run perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install.
> >
> > Then install razor-agent
ing on the network.
Equally important is to revoke. Razor is entirely based on human input so
unless people explicitly voice their disagreement the system will be
unable to self adjust.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design
--
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en
>
> _______
&g
HTML
dir and run perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install.
Then install razor-agents. Let me know if it helps.
best,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vip
bmissions will not have enough confidence to cross
the average.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ |
7;t exist, but in future it will return a negative confidence.
> For now I think I'll use ac + 10 or something like that and see how it goes.
I would be interested in your results too.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
So
s sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to
> $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v?
> http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
&
code.
· Made ::Agent taint friendly.
· Added support for passing an already open filehandle
to "::Agent::checkit()" and "::Agent::parse_mbox()"
· Made logic_method 4 the default.
· Added Razor2::Syslog to th
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
