[RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

I have some questions. If anyone has used it therapeutically, I'd be grateful to hear from him or her. For some reason, I "feel" that cannabis oil, or perhaps cannabis generally, is not too unrivendellian ...? Patrick Moore, who hasn't had a toke since 1983, and that one and all earlier ones were

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Unless it's been Grant-fathered in, it's OT, as would be any other medication or herbal supplement. On 09/10/2018 11:05 PM, Patrick Moore wrote: I have some questions. If anyone has used it therapeutically, I'd be grateful to hear from him or her. For some reason, I "feel" that cannabis oil,

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

The one person I know who uses CBD swears by it. She has severe PTSD with some depression and she says she has gotten tremendous relief, especially in helping her sleep but also in reducing her anxiety. On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 5:56:24 AM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: > > Unless it's

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Good thing that you are not a moderator of this group. Patrick Moore iPhone > On Sep 11, 2018, at 5:06 AM, 'Chris Lampe 2' via RBW Owners Bunch > wrote: > > The one person I know who uses CBD swears by it. She has severe PTSD with > some depression and she says she has gotten tremendous reli

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

To be clear this topic isn’t about cannabis oil it’s about whether or not cannabis oil is on topic, which clearly it is -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Chris: Can you send me your email address so that I can email you offlist? I have a question about your friend. Thanks, Patrick On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:06 AM, 'Chris Lampe 2' via RBW Owners Bunch < rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com> wrote: > The one person I know who uses CBD swears by it. Sh

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Why?  Was it mentioned in a Blagh?  If not, I can't see any reason why it would be.  This list is, after all, about Rivendell, bicycles and bicycling, not about pain relief remedies.  It's only when Grant himself mentions something in one of the Rivendell blogs that it falls under the Rivendell

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Surely it is within the domain of a Rivendell group to talk about what is within the domain of a Rivendell group. How else is the community able to define and enforce its rules? William Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:03 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote: > > Why? Was it mentioned in a B

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Certainly, the question is in scope.  It's the oil that's not. On 09/11/2018 04:10 PM, William Henderson wrote: Surely it is within the domain of a Rivendell group to talk about what is within the domain of a Rivendell group. How else is the community able to define and enforce its rules? Wi

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

I just want a cheap high. Surely that is not outside the group's remit? On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote: > Certainly, the question is in scope. It's the oil that's not. > > > > On 09/11/2018 04:10 PM, William Henderson wrote: > >> Surely it is within the domain of a Riven

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Wow, I'm a little struck by that. At best it sounds autocratic to say we can only talk about OT things if Grant brings it up first. At worst, it sounds cultish. It seems like a better policy to either just keep it about Rivendell products only *or* allow any tangentially related off-topic disc

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

sniffing*/tubular glue/*?  now that's something that's definitely on topic. On 09/11/2018 04:41 PM, Patrick Moore wrote: I just want a cheap high. Surely that is not outside the group's remit? On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Steve Palincsar > wrote: Certainly, t

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Rivendell branded edibles ... now maybe that's something we could all get behind (!) On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 4:49:57 PM UTC-4, Steve Palincsar wrote: > > sniffing* tubular glue*? now that's something that's definitely on topic. > > On 09/11/2018 04:41 PM, Patrick Moore wrote: > > I jus

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Sorry, this isn't GP's "mini-me" group ! Ahahahahahaa. As stated at the top this group isn't affiliated with RBW. It's not an extension or outlet for them. I can see why some people get the impression of Rivendell being "cultish". Patrick has made a number of OT postings

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

If you couched your stoner-queries in the context of an S24O, your Riv Content would have been self-evident and unassailable. Bill Lindsay El Cerrito, CA On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:42:03 PM UTC-7, Patrick Moore wrote: > > I just want a cheap high. Surely that is not outside the group'

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

Or an S420. Jeff Hagedorn Los Angeles, CA USA On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 5:16:46 PM UTC-7, Bill Lindsay wrote: > > If you couched your stoner-queries in the context of an S24O, your Riv > Content would have been self-evident and unassailable. > > Bill Lindsay > El Cerrito, CA > >> --

Re: [RBW] Off or on-topic? Cannabis oil

I thought what happened on a S24O stayed on the S24O... On 09/11/2018 08:16 PM, Bill Lindsay wrote: If you couched your stoner-queries in the context of an S24O, your Riv Content would have been self-evident and unassailable. Bill Lindsay El Cerrito, CA On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:42