Shawn I've been admiring your XO3 in the snaps where it show's up in your blog!
Maybe yours is lonely and wants a twin!!! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
When folks are asking $200 on CL for rusty all original (dry rotted
tires, rusty cables, etc) Schwinn Varsities then $180 for a nice BStone,
low end or not, is a deal.
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:28:28 PM UTC-8, Joe Bernard wrote:
Now now, Shawn :) $180 is a fair price, and that's a
LOL, that's true Ryan that some of those CL listings are truly absurd,
particularly in the Bay Area.
On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:40:24 AM UTC-8, RoadieRyan wrote:
When folks are asking $200 on CL for rusty all original (dry rotted
tires, rusty cables, etc) Schwinn Varsities then $180
Asking ≠ Getting.
With abandon,
Patrick
On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:40:24 AM UTC-7, RoadieRyan wrote:
When folks are asking $200 on CL for rusty all original (dry rotted
tires, rusty cables, etc) Schwinn Varsities then $180 for a nice BStone,
low end or not, is a deal.
On Sunday,
True, and my admonition that the '92 XO-3 is lowest-end is not the same
as low-end. Bridgestone didn't do cheap, lousy bikes. Some were just less
expensive, a bit heavier, and lugless. My '93 XO-5 (same bike, new number)
was a great city bike which I also took to the singletrack (with the stock
Joe Bernard and the 1992 XO-3 might be not cool, but they are also not
dumb
On Monday, December 16, 2013 1:12:17 PM UTC-8, Joe Bernard wrote:
True, and my admonition that the '92 XO-3 is lowest-end is not the same
as low-end. Bridgestone didn't do cheap, lousy bikes. Some were just less
Tony, thanks! Unfortunately my bike herd is in thinning mode especially
where it comes to overlap/redundancy, so I don't need another XO-3 right
now. (XO 1 or 2, maybe for the right price!)
And after all this banter, it would be nice if Captain Conway shows some
photos of his bike and how much
Buyers please be aware that this is the TIGed lowest-end model that became
the XO-5 in 93/94. It's a 700c-wheeled bike which resembled the rash of
hybrids on the market at that time. It was my first Bridgestone and a good
one, but it bears little resemblance to the later lugged XO-3s, or any
joe is correct. it's still probably worth $100 to $150 if it is in good shape.
a beater with some class.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hey, no bashing the 1992 XO-3! Yes, yes, it was the low end of the 92 XOs,
TIG welded (gasp!) and with 700C wheels (double gasp!) Yes, yes, it will
never be as cool as the 26 wheeled XOs. As for resembling the rash of
hybrids, it clearly stated in the 92 catalog that it was Better than your
Now now, Shawn :) $180 is a fair price, and that's a nice bike. The '94
TIGed 700c XO-4 is pretty sweet, too, and quite rare. I've never seen one
other than new-at-the-dealer back in the day.
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:15:19 PM UTC-8, Shawn Granton wrote:
Hey, no bashing the 1992 XO-3!
Pick a number bro.
Ryan
On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:36:09 AM UTC-8, Conway Bennett wrote:
I need to free up some space so I am looking to part with my XO-3. Its a
57; I am 5'10.99 and it fits great. I really like how it climbed when I
lived on Bainbridge Island. The bike is now in
I offer you $20 with shipping included if we are just throwing out offers.
On Dec 14, 2013 6:05 PM, rcnute rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
Pick a number bro.
Ryan
On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:36:09 AM UTC-8, Conway Bennett wrote:
I need to free up some space so I am looking to part with my
13 matches
Mail list logo
