[RBW] Re: Quickbeam 52cm?

2014-09-01 Thread Deacon Patrick
According to my geometry chart (not sure where online I captured it from), the 54 is the smallest listed, and it has a stand over height of 79.2. So you should be find with a size 54 cm and then play around with the stem to get your reach right. Top tube is 56. I am similarly fit to my 66 cm Qu

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam 52cm?

2014-09-01 Thread Mattt
Hopefully this chart helps. Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, sen

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam 52cm?

2014-09-01 Thread David Stein
Thanks! I just found this link which matches your numbers: http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/geometry.html Still curious about any sort of corresponding or recommended PBH. That standover seems a little on the tall side, especially if I do trail riding with it. My Hunqapillar has a standover of 76.5 a

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam 52cm?

2014-09-01 Thread ted
I am fairly certain that at least one run of quickbeams included a 650B 52cm frame. If you search you will find photos. I suspect they are rare as hens teeth though. Probably worth calling RBW to make sure they don't have a leftover hiding in the attic. -- You received this message because you

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam 52cm?

2014-09-01 Thread Deacon Patrick
I ride trails with mine all the time and have a blast. Never had an issue because of the frame being on the tall side of my riding window, and yes, I've needed to hop off a time or two. Here's proof of the fun: https://www.flickr.com/photos/32311885@N07/sets/72157644683556936/ https://www.flickr.