-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: Shimmy, according to BQ NRC
You sure he didn't mean a 26 frame size (not wheel size)?
On Dec 12, 11:42 am, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 14:40 -0500, Robert Zeidler wrote:
I concur with your opinion on the Paramount. I
Your experience with a 1972 Paramount is interesting. I have a 1977
P-15 Paramount, that I'm still riding, and I've never experienced any
problems with speed wobbles. It's a 26 frame bike with a 110mm
extension on the stem. It's rock steady descending on steep roads
with speeds attained of
It would interesting to know what combination of factors are
attributable to a bike having a tendency for speed wobbles.
Jim Cloud
Tucson, AZ
Which is the subject of the Shimmy Review in the Winter BQ!
The Winter BQ recounts opinions and experiences from the past 100 years in a
few pages,
I concur with your opinion on the Paramount. I, too, have a few of the 26
bikes, all 531 , and find they are rock steady. Is this a 27 wheel thing
maybe?
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 12, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Jim Cloud cloud...@aol.com wrote:
Your experience with a 1972 Paramount is interesting.
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 14:40 -0500, Robert Zeidler wrote:
I concur with your opinion on the Paramount. I, too, have a few of the 26
bikes, all 531 , and find they are rock steady. Is this a 27 wheel thing
maybe?
I do not recall a 1972 Paramount coming with 26 wheels. FWIW, mine had
27.
You sure he didn't mean a 26 frame size (not wheel size)?
On Dec 12, 11:42 am, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 14:40 -0500, Robert Zeidler wrote:
I concur with your opinion on the Paramount. I, too, have a few of the 26
bikes, all 531 , and find they are rock
