I've never known the weight of any of my bikes, and I've ridden lots of
bikes throughout my life.I mean, I've known published weights for
frames I've owned, but have never weighed my bike when built up.
Obviously everybody has different things they look for in a bicycle, and
different
I'm fine talking steel, lugs, carbon, groupsets, touring, fixies, really
just about anything bike related. Nothing really gets me going like
talking about rider weight. I am 6' and right around 225 pounds. Yes, I
will be the first to admit that I need to lose some weight, but I refuse to
call
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:18:01 PM UTC-5, charlie wrote:
I think this whole frame flex business has something to do with rider
power and weight also.
Yes, that's the idea - planing is realizing optimal frame flex
characteristics for a given rider. Kind of like getting fit for a pair
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-8, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:08 -0800, Jan Heine wrote:
That explains why in our experience, performance correlates only very
weakly with weight, but very strongly with optimized frame flex
characteristics.
For a
To the Group - this string is a perfect example of why I always try to read
the RBW Owners Bunch. Thanks to all. Bob (Indiana)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Cicloski lite...@comcast.net wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-8, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:58:13 PM UTC-5, Skenry wrote:
The only real way to compair weights is to have a frame built up with
normal duty heavy Riv-ish parts and then build it again with lighter
racing parts. Then you'd be able to notice a weight diffence.
Scott
If that's the
nicely said. when i discuss the difference in weight of my lightish steel
and my still 4 lbs lighter carbon, i am never thinking about my measured
performance or speed improvement. for me it is a more subtle appreciation
of the overall quality of the ride. the unmeasured feel of getting up to
Patrick in VT wrote: Would I rather shave 5lbs bike/body or increase my
functional threshold power from 300w to 325w? It's a no-brainer.
You are absolutely right. And that is why frame flex is so important.
Imagine a bike that allows you to put out 325W instead of 300W for the same
fatigue!
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:58:13 PM UTC-5, Skenry wrote:
The only real way to compair weights is to have a frame built up with
normal duty heavy Riv-ish parts and then build it again with lighter
racing parts. Then you'd be able to notice a weight diffence.
Scott
You don't need to
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:08 -0800, Jan Heine wrote:
That explains why in our experience, performance correlates only very
weakly with weight, but very strongly with optimized frame flex
characteristics.
For a mind-blowing example of the above, be sure to read the road test
of the titanium
Beside weight, tire quality and width, strength, and frame flex -- or,
better, suitability of frame for the rider: leaving these out, can anyone
speak (with meaning) about rider position, bike fit, and geometry suited
for rider position, and their relation to speed?
I come back to the Herse I
Addendum: Since I've experienced this fit/feel-cum-speed thing over almost
15 years with the '99 and for almost 10 with the '03, I think I can
discount psychology. With the Herse, the immediate feeling was: How like
the Rivs!
Shoulda kept it -- except that I needed the $$. I hope the Ram ends up
Oh! One last thing: How like the Rivs! I mean in the kind of feel that
makes you pedal more effectively. I **don't** mean handling. It was fine,
but not great -- *that's* another big reason for selling.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:17 AM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
Addendum: Since
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:18:52 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote:
For a mind-blowing example of the above, be sure to read the road test
of the titanium road bikes in the current issue of BQ. (I'm going to
leave the big reveal to Jan, if he wants to pick up on the cue...)
i'm
Also a quick measure can be found here...
http://bikecalculator.com
Enjoy
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:15:47 AM UTC-6, Jan Heine wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:58:13 PM UTC-5, Skenry wrote:
The only real way to compair weights is to have a frame built up with
normal duty heavy
Please post the link
Scott
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:
Just in case anyone is interested, my 2009 Specialized S-Works Roubaix
frameset is now on ebay. My favorite ride in the last 10 years has now been
replaced with the next size up.
On Saturday,
http://my.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MyEbaygbh=1CurrentPage=MyeBayAllSellingssPageName=STRK:ME:LNLK:MESX
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Skenry wrote:
Please post the link
Scott
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, eflayer eddie@att.net
javascript:wrote:
Just in case
My man eflayer posted a link. I clicked it and it didn't work. But I did
find his auction:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2009-Specialized-Roubaix-S-Works-frameset-58-/150980228930?pt=Road_Bikeshash=item23271f7742
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:24:48 PM UTC-8, eflayer wrote:
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
My man eflayer posted a link. I clicked it and it didn't work. But I did find
his auction:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2009-Specialized-Roubaix-S-Works-frameset-58-/150980228930?pt=Road_Bikeshash=item23271f7742
that weird as it works when i click on it in your message and my message.
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:41:41 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
My man eflayer posted a link. I clicked it and it didn't work. But I did
find his auction:
...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Subject:* Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
My man eflayer posted a link. I clicked it and it didn't work. But I did
find his auction:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2009-Specialized-Roubaix-S-Works-frameset-58-/150980228930?pt=Road_Bikeshash=item23271f7742
eflayer
That's I'm not you. Only you are you. :-)
When you click your link, it goes to My Ebay. When I click on your link,
it goes to My Ebay. I'm not selling a Roubaix frameset, so My Ebay
isn't the way for me to get there.
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:50:46 PM UTC-8, eflayer
News flash. My man Pudge has retro-grouch tendencies. Show us your
beer-truck again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
News flash. My man Pudge has retro-grouch tendencies. Show us your beer-truck
again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
News flash. My man Pudge has retro-grouch tendencies. Show us your beer-truck
again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
javascript: [mailto:
rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *William
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:58 PM
*To:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Subject:* Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
News flash. My man Pudge has retro-grouch tendencies. Show us your
Ah, there's hope for yet!
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of eflayer
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:18 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
Dudes. I did not ride one of those until
For me yet, that is
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Allingham II, Thomas J
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:18 PM
To: 'rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
Ah, there's hope for yet
:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *William
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:58 PM
*To:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Subject:* Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
News flash. My man Pudge has retro
-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing
Pudge tells me to jump, and I ask How High?
I tell Pudge to show his beer-truck and he asks Which One?
perfecto!
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:59:18 PM UTC-8, Pudge wrote:
Which one, Bill – they’re all slow and load-carrying
I wish there was a like button.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/m-kCbedQ4fAJ.
To post to this group, send email to
Bill, maybe you should sell your Roubaix... it would be closer to Pudge's
size.
~mike
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:56:06 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
eflayer
That's I'm not you. Only you are you. :-)
When you click your link, it goes to My Ebay. When I click on your
link, it goes to
I think this whole frame flex business has something to do with rider power
and weight also. I don't believe a super light tubed frame would last long
with me riding it and would most likely develop cracks sooner. Were I 165
pounds again maybe not but the average beginner male cyclist over 40
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 20:13 -0800, eflayer wrote:
I was surprised the OP did not think that pounds of extra weight might
not be responsible for the go fast feel of his go fast bike...even
though by some standards both are relatively heavy. But 4 pounds is 4
pounds. I was suggesting weight is a
now that is an interesting proposal. i'd bet against you on that one though
:)
On Monday, January 14, 2013 6:24:34 AM UTC-8, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 20:13 -0800, eflayer wrote:
I was surprised the OP did not think that pounds of extra weight might
not be responsible
I have two Abus Bordo locks. One is the very heavy Granite, the other the
new ultra-light.
I got the ultra-light version for my Kellogg / Spectrum road bike.
Typically the only time I stop when on that bike is to pick up a drink or
what not, so lock security is not an issue. I like the
My money is with Steve Palinscar.
This reminds me of a long debate/argument I had with a coworker at the bike
shop. My coworker, Greg, insisted that an 18lb road bike was way faster
than a 20lb road bike. That's a commonly held position, as we all know. I
pointed out what I believe to be
Maybe Greg spent too much time around the Framesaver. I hear it can kill
brain cells, haha.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
My money is with Steve Palinscar.
This reminds me of a long debate/argument I had with a coworker at the
bike shop. My coworker,
Its not so much the weight as the location and type of weight.
Take a racing bike, replace the low spoke count wheels with some heavy duty
touring wheels. Weight difference in the wheels can easily be felt. Water
bottle do add pounds, but not in the manner that rotating weight does.
Outside of
William's buddy Greg is not alone. Lots of magical thinking pervades all
aspects of cycling even among some who have a seemingly solid background in
physics. Credit marketing hype for overpowering reason. I believe that, at some
point, lightweight becomes an issue of bragging rights rather than
And lighter.
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Mike Schiller mikeybi...@rocketmail.com wrote:
next thing you know someone is going to say skinnier tires are faster too!
~mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
RBW Owners
There applies the law of diminishing returns.
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 14, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery thill@gmail.com
wrote:
William's buddy Greg is not alone. Lots of magical thinking pervades all
aspects of cycling even among some who have a seemingly solid
It may not be weight, or it may be lower wheel weight, but I consistently
-- over 10 years -- find myself climbing faster, particularly when I stand,
on my 18 lb (pedals, cage, but no seat bag or bottle) gofast --
particularly noticeable because it is geared higher (75) than my other
bikes. In
One more remark on sensations of fastness -- which can be correlated, at
least to some degree, with actual speed if you are accustomed to (1) riding
the same gears or very similar gears on different bikes and (2) are
sufficiently aware of your cadence: the tricycle (narrow-tubed 531, and
light for
Agreed. I normally ride anywhere from 66-69cm bikes. I love my Rivs for the
ride quality. But if I'm doing a metric or a double-metric century w/thousands
of feet in climbing on New England hills where there's a lot of 8-12% grades
all the time, I'm taking my Roubaix (64cm, 18.2lbs), or a Seven
You go, guy! I wholeheartedly agree with the general proposition that,
ceteris paribus, lighter is righter. Of course there are many cetera to
considera!
Patrick 18, ~25 (with empty Sackville Med and #4 HpX and lights), ~29/33
lb, all ready to ride Moore
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Robert
The idea of me weighing a bike is like weighing myself, pointless other
than to illustrate what I already know. I sure do like to ride the bikes I
have though. I guess if it ever gets to where I am using a scale to weigh
my food I can worry about a few pounds here or there on a bike. Not that
Although I do not dispute that weight plays a part in how a bike *feels*,
unless your Rivs weigh close to 30 lb or you weigh closer to 100 than 200
lb, those few pounds is only a very small percentage of the total
bike+rider+accessories weight, which is what's important in a purely
48 matches
Mail list logo
