On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 16:28 -0700, John Speare wrote:
>
> I agree that it probably wasn't designed for a 290'er, but it better
> be designed for a 220'er at least. I see lots of big big dudes around
> here on fly-weight carbon bikes with low-spoke-count wheels.
>
I wonder how many of them are us
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 15:04 -0700, rperks wrote:
> > If I want a "road" bike, no matter what the percieved
> > light and fast marketing schtik is, it will likely be built for the
> > potential heavy weight.
>
> I think it's pretty safe to
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 15:04 -0700, rperks wrote:
> If I want a "road" bike, no matter what the percieved
> light and fast marketing schtik is, it will likely be built for the
> potential heavy weight.
I think it's pretty safe to say your LBS carbon fiber racing bike with
the lightly spoked wheels
Grant -
Thanks for adding some behind-the-scenes facts to the discussion.
The San Marcos and Roadeo have both seemed like four-wheel-drive Ferraris to
me - fat, plush suspension slung below a rocket sled frame.
It's always interesting to see how these projects evolve.
- J
--
Jim Edgar
cyclof
