Thanks, Ted; your remarks incline me further toward trying tubulars, fatter
than 22 mm, but still "road" width.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:07 PM ted wrote:
> Patrick M,
>
> Hm.
>
> First I'd encourage anybody who hasn't used tubulars, is up for the gluing
> aspect, and has an interest in it
Patrick M,
Hm.
First I'd encourage anybody who hasn't used tubulars, is up for the gluing
aspect, and has an interest in it to give them a try.
Though I like my RH tires, I think comparing RH tires to tubulars is sort
of apples to oranges. The tubulars I rode were 21 or 22 mm road racing
Ted: Wrestling in prayer not to jerk the thread onto a tangent, but giving
in to sin with the consolation that the tangent isn't irrelevant: Do you
find that the best GB and RH clinchers perform (criteria: rolling
resistance, at least perceived, and cushioning over bumps of any sort) as
well as
You most certainly do not need to run a tubeless compatible tire
tubeless. They're just fine with tubes.
On 6/15/20 10:16 AM, Benz, Sunnyvale, CA wrote:
I don't believe you /need/ to run RH tubeless-compatible tires
tubeless. These tires have a special bead that has been designed for
