Hello,
I've added "field" and "field_readonly" to allow exposing public data members of
a c++ class. For example (from the unit tests):
test.Module.member <- function(){
inc <- '
class Num{
public:
Num() : x(0.0), y(0){} ;
d
On 2010-06-08, at 10:46 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
>>> Reading the information on writing R extensions, it sounds like there
>>> may not be a way to get to the address of an object in another
>>> package's DLL. (In this case, in stats.so.) However, there is a
>>> NativeSymbolInfo for stats:::R_loe
On 2010-06-09, at 12:03 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> ... at a fundamental level, I am not yet sure that 'poking through' an api
> that R Core has sealed is the right idea.
>
> My hunch is that I would just take the code to loess_raw and stick it into a
> small utility package so that one coul
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 10 June 2010 at 10:35, Vinh Nguyen wrote:
> | Thanks Dirk. I've been using the package skeleton method, and added
> | PKG_CXXFLAGS = $(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e "Rcpp:::CxxFlags()" )
> | $(shell Rscript -e "cat( '-I',
> | sys
On 10 June 2010 at 10:35, Vinh Nguyen wrote:
| Thanks Dirk. I've been using the package skeleton method, and added
| PKG_CXXFLAGS = $(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e "Rcpp:::CxxFlags()" )
| $(shell Rscript -e "cat( '-I',
| system.file('include', package = 'RcppArmadillo'), sep = '' )" )
|
| into
Thanks Dirk. I've been using the package skeleton method, and added
PKG_CXXFLAGS = $(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e "Rcpp:::CxxFlags()" )
$(shell Rscript -e "cat( '-I',
system.file('include', package = 'RcppArmadillo'), sep = '' )" )
into the Makevars file per Romain's suggestion.
RcppArmadillo:
We're still not really in a habit of announcing releases here (though I try
to do so on my blog) so briefly:
-- following up on Rcpp 0.8.1, we have a new RcppArmadillo which contains
Armadillo 0.9.10, supports the plugin mechanism from inline 0.3.5 and
some more fixes
-- following up o
Vinh,
Please have a look at RcppArmadillo 0.2.2 which should helpfully be easier to
use in the cases you tried, ie outside of a package. A quick example is on
my blog at http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/
--
Regards, Dirk
___
Rcpp-devel mailing lis
On 10 June 2010 at 10:47, Douglas Bates wrote:
| I thought I had had enough coffee this morning not to make really dumb
| mistakes but perhaps not.
|
| I want to check that a particular NumericVector is within a feasible
| region defined by lower and upper bounds on each element. For the
| lower
I thought I had had enough coffee this morning not to make really dumb
mistakes but perhaps not.
I want to check that a particular NumericVector is within a feasible
region defined by lower and upper bounds on each element. For the
lower bound I am checking for the equivalent of any(x < lowerBd)
10 matches
Mail list logo
