> Tst tst tst: You're loosing your Debian/Ubuntu instincts:
>
> edd@max:~$ wajig search sundials
> libsundials-cvode1 - ordinary differentialequation solver (SUNDIALS library)
...
> edd@max:~$
>
> Bingo, another Rcpp project in the making :)
Now wait just a sec -- with the powers of apt-cache sear
And here is what I meant:
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rsundials/index.html
Sadly, the package has not been updated for a long time and like I said
before, it only covers basic functionality like solving an ODE. If that is
all you want to do, it might still work for you though. What I nee
On 5 October 2011 at 16:59, Douglas Bates wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 5 October 2011 at 14:07, Douglas Bates wrote:
| > | On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jonas Rauch
wrote:
| > | > I am using the deSolve package successfully and I think it is pro
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 5 October 2011 at 14:07, Douglas Bates wrote:
> | On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jonas Rauch
> wrote:
> | > I am using the deSolve package successfully and I think it is probably
> your
> | > best option if you want to do things i
On 5 October 2011 at 14:07, Douglas Bates wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jonas Rauch
wrote:
| > I am using the deSolve package successfully and I think it is probably your
| > best option if you want to do things in R.
| > The most widespread solver in C++ is the Sundials Suite as far
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Ian Fellows wrote:
>> Sorry, I should have been more explicit. I can install rcpp okay. The error
>> occurs when installing a package that I'm developing. The installs fine with
>> 0.9.4, but not with 0.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Ian Fellows wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more explicit. I can install rcpp okay. The error
> occurs when installing a package that I'm developing. The installs fine with
> 0.9.4, but not with 0.9.7. Interestingly it is the compiler that blows up...
And not
Sorry, I should have been more explicit. I can install rcpp okay. The error
occurs when installing a package that I'm developing. The installs fine with
0.9.4, but not with 0.9.7. Interestingly it is the compiler that blows up...
Ian
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
> Hi
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jonas Rauch wrote:
> I am using the deSolve package successfully and I think it is probably your
> best option if you want to do things in R.
> The most widespread solver in C++ is the Sundials Suite as far as I know:
> https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/mai
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Ian Fellows wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am getting a compiler seg fault with 0.9.6 and 0.9.7, however the error
> does not occur in 0.9.4.
>
> When running R CMD INSTALL the following error is given:
>
> util.h: In function 'Rcpp::XPtr >
> gergm::unwrap_robjec
Hi All,
I am getting a compiler seg fault with 0.9.6 and 0.9.7, however the error does
not occur in 0.9.4.
When running R CMD INSTALL the following error is given:
util.h: In function 'Rcpp::XPtr >
gergm::unwrap_robject(SEXPREC* const&) [with T =
gergm::BinaryNet]':
util.h:30: internal compil
I am using the deSolve package successfully and I think it is probably your
best option if you want to do things in R.
The most widespread solver in C++ is the Sundials Suite as far as I know:
https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/main.html
I think someone starting writing an interface to R, b
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richard Downe wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 05:05 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>
>> I am working with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, some of
>> which can only be represented as the solutions of ordinary
>> differential equations. I am looking for ODE sofware writte
On 10/04/2011 05:05 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
I am working with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, some of
which can only be represented as the solutions of ordinary
differential equations. I am looking for ODE sofware written in C++.
The deSolve package for R has lots of wonderful functions
Thanks, I'll weigh my options going forward, but I appreciate seeing
another approach.
--rd
On 10/05/2011 08:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 October 2011 at 19:53, Richard Downe w
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2011 at 19:53, Richard Downe wrote:
>> | Since I'm a bit of a glutton for punishment, and I would like to see
>> | this feature...are there major technical hurdles a
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2011 at 19:53, Richard Downe wrote:
> | Since I'm a bit of a glutton for punishment, and I would like to see
> | this feature...are there major technical hurdles as to why this has not
> | been implemented (e.g., I should j
17 matches
Mail list logo
