Hmmm . . . Huge target, thin armour, poor field of fire.
Nope. Never thought about building one.
It would look impressive as it trundled back to base though.
Pete.
On May 24, 4:47 am, Jason R Schafer jasonrscha...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody think about building the
that is one BIG gun...
On May 24, 1:47 pm, Jason R Schafer jasonrscha...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody think about building the
Karl?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6rser_Karl
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sgt.A.Johnson
callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Looks like an interesting build, although an impracticle one. how
about one of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neubaufahrzeug Not
a full production model i dont think so you probably wouldnt be
The Nazi's were so awesome in their dedication to huge impractical designs.
And when I run for office, Dateline is going to have a field day with that
sentence.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Bill Hamilton billw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sgt.A.Johnson
Updated with fully armed test this morning.
http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f351/cjsoftuk/RCTC%20-%20T027/?action=viewcurrent=2009-24-05132102.flv
Sorry about the slightly shaky camerawork, but I was trying to do
everything (including turn on and off the air system) with one hand - my
LEFT
Why would I not sell them ? I can only operate one at a time , Im
keeping the leopard . If I sell To68 then I will build a new tank. If
that new tank is `better` that the leopard then I will sell the
leopard, and so on. Weather anyone will want to buy any of these
assets we will have to see. I
that’s very good work Chris ,nice to see To27 fully operational again.
You may be tempted to operate it in one or more of the up and coming
battles.
Neil R
On May 24, 2:04 pm, Chris Malton chr...@cmalton.me.uk wrote:
Updated with fully armed test this morning.
It is probable that July 11/12th will see an absence of the Challenger
due a small technical hitch involving car door lock actuators and high
currents See historic discussions for more info on that. I will
probably be running T027 (which now does turns on the spot :-) ).
However, if I
I myself have burnt out a door actuator or two and one Idea I had was to fit a
4 amp use after the battle switch and before the actuator, see pic
http://s224.photobucket.com/albums/dd267/neroc1/?action=viewcurrent=fusefrombattlesw.jpg
This is ok but I have had an idea recently that now also
I can only see target tracking aas a way of practising tanking skills
in a back garden or something. Just a training thing. It looks cool
but thats about it i reckon
On May 24, 8:47 pm, Mike Måne mike082...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt, where do you live? I'm all alone in my world as well.
-Mike M
On this topic, the month's Servo has an article about Mech Warfare:
http://mech-warfare.com/default.aspx
It is the first in a series about building one.
Apparently, the game is set up so you you can't see your mech. They have
cameras and you are the pilot wandering around a 1/24 scale city. So
11 matches
Mail list logo