That first one is getting better, other one way to small. Either will require
you to fabricate a geardown mechanism, thereby obliterating any cost savings.
If you take my advice (and I hope that of others here), the motor is important,
and in the scheme of the overall cost of your vehicle, just
http://banebots.com/pc/MOTOR-BRUSH/M4-R0062-12
http://banebots.com/pc/MOTOR-BRUSH/M5-RS775-18
what about these 2 motor??
On Jul 11, 7:28 pm, Ben Holko wrote:
> Unless your tank is going to be EXTREMELY light, that motor will be to small.
>
> An M01 has more than three times the torque, well mo
What are the dimensions of the piece? How much would it cost?
Ryan P.
> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:31:49 -0400
> Subject: [TANKS] Treadmill track
> To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
> From: saintofswitchbla...@tmail.com
>
> I remember seeing a few emails back and forth in the past few days ab
Unless your tank is going to be EXTREMELY light, that motor will be to small.
An M01 has more than three times the torque, well more than three times the
stall current, and weighs about 7 times as much.
Ben
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [rctankcom
http://www.robotmarketplace.com/products/0-MP-36064-540.html
link to the motor
On Jul 11, 7:24 pm, Weston wrote:
> I think i found a motor, a BaneBots 64:1, 36mm Planetary Gearmotor,
> RS-540 Motor. From what I can gather it is a little less in
> performance then then the M01 @ 24v, but it is a
I think i found a motor, a BaneBots 64:1, 36mm Planetary Gearmotor,
RS-540 Motor. From what I can gather it is a little less in
performance then then the M01 @ 24v, but it is a 12v motor, and also
costs less.
On Jun 29, 8:34 pm, jvragu47 wrote:
> Wait until you get the scale drawing. Then make a
