Oh come on, those multi-turreted ground cruisers are obviously unmanageable
by current rules. But the PL-01 is just a regular tank with different shape.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:56:08 AM UTC-8, TyngTech wrote:
Maybe to entice some of the warship crowd into the better side of the
The pl-01 like those land cruisers only exists in concept. At least the e100
was being built if only in the soft steel prototype stages
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: fan fan jerryfan...@gmail.com
Sender: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013
That PL-01 tank looks like a mild update of the once rumored Panzer II Ausf
G (a Plasticine up-armoured F). I say once rumored because it's my
understanding that the F variant (or more like pieces of) have now been
excavated near Wilhelmstraße 77 Berlin. I'm sure the elder Pittelli can
I take it the rule saying tank has to have been produced is scrapped?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: TyngTech steve...@gmail.com
Sender: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:05:57
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Reply-To:
^^ I wouldnt say that.
1) He may not plan on entering his E100 in the battles, at which point you
dont have jurisdiction. My t34-85 is being made to conform to your rules,
because i hope to enter it. My ferdiand, of which i have no intention of
taking to the field with, is not.
2) The rules may
Ferdi's were production vehicles...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, isaac goldman panthergol...@gmail.comwrote:
^^ I wouldnt say that.
1) He may not plan on entering his E100 in the battles, at which point you
dont have jurisdiction. My t34-85 is being made to conform to your rules,
Yes, but im building mine in a much smaller scale than the rules require.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Derek Engelhaupt tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Ferdi's were production vehicles...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, isaac goldman
panthergol...@gmail.comwrote:
^^ I wouldnt say that.
