[RDA-L] Ég er í sumarfríi til 10. ágúst

I will be out of the office starting 02.08.2012 and will not return until 10.08.2012. Ég er í sumarfríi til 10. ágúst, hef samband þegar ég kem til baka

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

Thanks to Joanna for citing this PCC recommendation. OCLC’s view on the order of subfields is also very much influenced by this recommendation. We believe that having $e in a consistent position and in the position that is recommended will assist in the quick identification of RDA records. Gl

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

The PCC Task Group on AACR2 & RDA Acceptable Heading Categories: Recommendation 5.13, reads: */Task Group recommendations:/* 1. Consistently display 040 subfield $e immediately preceding the 040 subfield $c. 1. If the subfield is repeated, display in the order each subfield $e wa

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

During phase 2 of the manipulation of the LC/NACO authority file for use under RDA (to take place next March, knock on wood): If an AACR2 authority record ("AACR2" does not include AACR2-compatible) is otherwise being modified (for example, to change "b." in subfield $d of an X00 field to a hyph

[RDA-L] Additions to the JSC web site: August 1, 2012

These proposals have been added to the JSC web site: [http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html] 6JSC/ALA/15 Hearings in RDA 19.2.1.1.1 6JSC/ALA/19 Proposed Revision of RDA 16.2.2 (Preferred Name for the Place) 6JSC/EURIG/1 Addition of examples in RDA 6.12.1.3 and 6.27.3 6JSC/EURIG/2

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

I'm sorry, typo there - there is a school of thought that *$e* should precede $c. -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Moore, Richard Sent: 02 August 2012 07:53 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-