I said:
>Searching for a 710$4 code for aggregator, the closest
>I have found is $4rps Repository.
Perhaps $edst Distributor would be better?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \_
Searching for a 710$4 code for aggregator, the closest
I have found is $4rps Repository. Has anyone a better
suggestion?
It seems to be set code or term lists can never be complete.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://ww
>AACR2 should continue to be provided among Desktop's long list of cataloging
>resources instead of being singularly tied to RDA subscription, if for no
>other reason than to avoid an appearance of being heavy-handed.
Regardless of what one thinks about RDA or the methods of its adoption, its
b
Chris,
I think not only you understood correctly but the announcement is
misleading to claim that:
RDA Toolkit recognizes that AACR2 is an important tool for catalogers
during the transition to RDA and for the foreseeable future.
It that's the case, AACR2 should continue to be provided among
Deskt
Please excuse cross-postings.
NOTSL will hold its Fall Meeting at the Kent State University Main Campus
Student Center located in Kent, Ohio.
The program, entitled “The Real Transformers: How E-Resources are Shaping
Technical Services,” will focus on how e-resources are changing technical
ser
The change described is for online access to AACR2 which before RDA
Toolkit's launch in June 2010 was only available in Cataloger's Desktop
and now is available in both products. Both AACR2 and RDA are available
in print for those that can't justify online access.
The change reflects an evolutio
Thanks very much for the suggestion!
Interestingly enough (at least to me): The proposed program for handling RDA
7XX fields will already produce a flat file that can be used to flip headings
from the suggested RDA form in the 7XX back to an acceptable AACR2 form where
available, but until no
When AACR2 Authority records are converted to RDA Authorities, will there be a
place I can find a list of those that have new 1xx fields? I will really only
need those for which the authorized heading changed, the other changes to the
record will be less important to our library, and can be loa
8 matches
Mail list logo