[RDA-L] Relationship designators (with typo corrections; thanks)

abridger actor addressee animator annotator appellant appellee architect [arranger] arranger of music [consider arranger] art director artist author autographer binder book designer [consider designer] braile embosser broadcaster cartographer caster [cataloguer]

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators (with typo corrections; thanks)

I have been reading the discussions that there are too many relationship designators, differences between types of editors, etc. However, reading through this list - is there a relationship designator for the person who wrote the foreword? The book in hand is: Thorton Wilder, a life ...

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators (with typo corrections; thanks

writer of added commentary ^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-8409 (206) 685-8782 fax asch...@u.washington.edu http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators (with typo corrections; thanks)

However, reading through this list - is there a relationship designator for the person who wrote the foreword? There is: writer of added text To have a phrase for every possibility: preface, forword, introduction, abstract, summary, addendum, annotations, etc. would soon become too much it

Re: [RDA-L] Cringeworthy RDA terminology

No, because a compiler is a creator, i.e. a 100 field entry, and can appear in a citation. The person who puts together a bibliography is a compiler. The person who puts together a conference proceedings is an editor of a compilation. No, because editor implies changing or adding text (cf. the