Re: [RDA-L] Source of new terms for 300 subfield a

Darmae Brown said: >I notice that we don't have to use sound disc and video disc, etc. /when describing the resource in RDA. Audio disc and DVD are being .used. Is there a list somewhere of what is permissible in the 300 .subfield a? RDA's first option is to use a term from the carrier list. O

Re: [RDA-L] Source of new terms for 300 subfield a

The instructions for recording extent are in 3.4.1.3 in the RDA Toolkit. There you are told to use "an appropriate term for the type of carrier as listed under 3.3.1.3." The latter is where you find a list of acceptable terms, such as audio disc. RDA 3.4.1.5 also gives you permission to use a te

Re: [RDA-L] deriving records in OCLC Connexion

Jane, thanks so much. I've just installed it and tried it out, and I think it will be a great timesaver. The two modifications I think I'm going to try to make--and this will be an incentive to dust off my very ancient and very rudimentary macro-editing skills--will be to add subfield $b (codes)

[RDA-L] Source of new terms for 300 subfield a

Hello, I notice that we don't have to use sound disc and video disc, etc. when describing the resource in RDA. Audio disc and DVD are being used. Is there a list somewhere of what is permissible in the 300 subfield a? A URL would be especially helpful. Thank you, Darmae Brown Darmae Brown,

Re: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?

I've been told that, for now, information in the 34X fields can and should continue to be duplicated in the 007 and the 538 (NTSC or PAL, etc.), until such time as ILSs catch up. So in the limited RDA A/V cataloging I have done, everything that I'm putting in 34X is also somewhere else in the M