This announcement has been posted on the JSC website:
"The proposals, discussion papers, etc., related to revision and
development of RDA from the JSC constituencies and others have been
submitted for discussion at the November 4-8, 2013 JSC meeting in
Washington, D.C., USA. A *table of the
docume
The usualyl practical and level headed Kevin said:
>Personally, I'd lean more toward Deborah's "Numbering in the main
?series: 988" since it gives significantly more information than just
>the number alone in a quoted note.
Why would one do such a note in the first place? Would it not assist
pat
Thank you everyone. I kind of knew this would be the answer, so I probably
shouldn't have wasted everyone's time, I just thought that the LC or PCC
people on the list might know of a change in the works, but it seems to not
be the case. Will feel comfortable now using the British, etc. spellin
Thank you everyone! Sorry I made this more complicated by not including
the information about fonts, superscript and the color of the text in my
first message. I don't know why I didn't think of that initially. Thank
you all for revisiting this after my mess up. I never would have come up
with
Wow, Dana, that is *exactly* the kind of thing that I picturing as a
possibility (and hoping wasn't the case...)! That would make Deborah's and
John's approaches (take your pick) seem appropriate. Personally, I'd lean more
toward Deborah's "Numbering in the main series: 988" since it gives
si
On 05/08/2013 16:46, Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
> 05.08.2013 16:04, JSC Secretary:
>> You can choose the higher-level designator "writer of supplementary
>> textual content" if you don't want to or cannot identify a more specific
>> relationship.
>>
> This leaves me wondering whether or not the rel
Kevin, thanks for the thoughtful response.
Irrespective of the term "main entry" & the necessities of AAP for citations,
and of one's preferences in the future organization of RDA, in Appendix I in
the current version, RDA itself is saying that "architect" represents a
corporate body/work rela
With a 'Registry' of terms, which will hopefully be 'officially' up and running
soon, alternate spellings of terms should be handled like alternate languages,
for indexing, filing, and displays, i.e., you get to pick which 'registered'
term you want to enter and have display, and underneath (for
8 matches
Mail list logo
