Re: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP

Dear Michael, I believe this is the LC-PCC PS you are looking for (2.2.2.1): LC practice/PCC practice: Do not consider pre-publication cataloging data (foreign or domestic) appearing in the item as a source of information for transcribed elements. (note the emphasis on *transcribed* elements

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

Adam, Yes, the PCC practice statement for 2.8.1.4 (Generally do not omit levels in corporate hierarchy) is among those that will be published in the October release of the RDA Toolkit. Dave -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mail

[RDA-L] Library of Congress Announces Modeling Initiative (Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative)

Apologies for cross-posting; feel free to forward to other lists Library of Congress Announces Modeling Initiative The Library of Congress is pleased to announce that it has contracted with Zepheira to help accelerate the launch of the Bibliographic Framework Initiative. A major focus of the

[RDA-L] LC Publishes Initial Plan for Bibliographic Framework Transition

Apologies for cross-posting: The Library of Congress is pleased to release - for dissemination, sharing, and feedback - the initial plan for its Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative. The plan is available at: http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/framework-103111.html Add

Re: [RDA-L] Completeness of records

Dear Hal and others: It is true that every time you see your data in a new environment, the anomalies jump out-- the addition of LC/NAF records to VIAF is no exception. With regard to VIAF, it is true that OCLC Research has sent numerous lists of errors, possible errors, or even just things th

[RDA-L] Announcing the availability of the full public report on the US RDA Test from LC/NAL/NLM

Apologies (again) for distribution to multiple lists: The full "Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee on the implementation of RDA-Resource Description & Access" (192 pages) is now publicly available on the US RDA Test Home Page: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographi

[RDA-L] Announcing the LC/NAL/NLM RDA Implementation decision

(Apologies for cross posting) The Library of Congress, the National Agricultural Library, and the National Library of Medicine are pleased to issue a statement from the Executives of the three libraries regarding the Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee on the

[RDA-L] Transforming our Bibliographic Framework (LC initiative)

Apologies for duplication, being sent to multiple lists (feel free to forward as appropriate): The Library of Congress is sharing the statement, "Transforming our Bibliographic Framework," for the benefit of its external constituen

[RDA-L] Informal Participation in the US National Library RDA Test

[Apologies for posting to multiple lists; please feel free to forward as necessary] Although the US National Library RDA Test Coordinating Committee announced the 26 formal test participant institutions last year (http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/test-partners.html), the Coo

[RDA-L] LC reconsidering the cataloging treatment of reproductions for the RDA test

[Apologies for duplication; feel free to forward as appropriate] Reconsidering the cataloging treatment of reproductions The cataloging treatment of reproductions at LC is being reconsidered as part of a full-scale reevaluation of cataloging policy decisions necessitated by the upcoming tes