[RDA-L] Uniform titles in RDA

Is it now RDA practice to enter the uniform title with articles? Example: LCCN 2013002020 OCLC 828333810 has a 240 14 The new school counselor rather than 240 10 New school counselor Jay Shorten Cataloger, Monographs and Electronic Resources Associate Professor of Bibliography Catalog Departmen

[RDA-L] Photocopy of a thesis in RDA?

I am cataloguing a photocopy of a thesis for which there is no record for the original thesis, so no "linking" is possible. How and where do I indicate the photocopied nature of the item? My attempt is: 246 _0 1948 [the date of the original thesis] 246 _3 [198-?] [an estimate as to when it was p

Re: [RDA-L] Size of PDF files

What about using the 256 field? I know it has been deprecated in AACR2, but it seems to have been restored for RDA, as the MARC Bibliographic to RDA Mapping in the tools for 3.19.4 leads to the 256 field. Though if I can continue to use the 300, that’s great. Jay Shorten Cataloger, Monographs a

[RDA-L] Recall: [RDA-L] Size of PDF files

Shorten, Jay would like to recall the message, "[RDA-L] Size of PDF files".

Re: [RDA-L] Size of PDF files

What about the 256 field? I know it has been deprecated in AACR2, but it seems to have been restored for RDA, as the MARC Bibliographic to RDA Mapping in the tools for 3.19.4 leads to the 256 field. From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.L

Re: [RDA-L] Title main entry equivalent in RDA?

OK, it looks like the LC-PCC policy statement for 19.2.1.1.1 restores AACR2 21.1C1c through the back entrance, at least for corporate bodies: Applicability, 2b: Do not consider the corporate body to be the creator if there is any doubt that a work falls into any of the categories. The corporat

[RDA-L] Title main entry equivalent in RDA?

I'd like someone to confirm my understanding of the rules. The AACR2 rules for title main entry are as follows: AACR2 21.1C. Entry under Title 21.1C1. Enter a work under its title proper or, when appropriate, uniform title (see chapter 25) if: a) the personal authorship is unknown (see 21.5) o

[RDA-L] Request to check RDA record for provider-neutral e-book

I have created a record for the provider-neutral e-book OCLC #842051596. Would someone be so kind as to look it over just to make sure I haven't forgotten something? Also, does anyone have a handy list of traps to avoid when creating an RDA record, something like, "Be sure you don't forget to do

[RDA-L] RDA headings in bib record?

OCLC 663441379 (LCCN 2010045710), besides the erroneous “p.” and “ill.” in the 300 (if it’s an RDA record, shouldn’t these be spelled out?) has an RDA-style name heading (Rawson, Claude ‡q (Claude Julien), ‡d 1935-) instead of the form currently in the authority file, “Rawson, Claude Julien”. S

[RDA-L] An other title information question

OCLC 714614925 / ISBN 9783706905909 has as a 245: Geschichte des portugiesischen Kinos : ‡b mit Personen- und Filmregister und 44 Abbildungen The 245 means “with a name and film index and 44 illustrations”. This was not the kind of thing that was traditionally considered other title information

Re: [RDA-L] Apocrypha

Ecclesiasticus = Sirach 1 & 2 Esdras, not part of Catholic canon, but part of Orthodox canon Wisdom of Solomon = Wisdom Susanna, Three Children, Bel & Dragon = extra chapters in Daniel Prayer of Manasses, not part of Catholic canon, but part of Orthodox canon Jay Shorten Cataloger, Monographs and

[RDA-L] Catholic deuterocanonical Biblical books

6.23.2.9.2 says, "For books of the Catholic or Protestant canon, record the brief citation form of the Authorized Version as a subdivision of the preferred title for the Bible." But 6.23.2.9.4 says, "For an individual book [of the Apocrypha] use the name of the book as a further subdivision", "

[RDA-L] RDA capitalization and edition question (basic)

LCCN 2010044821 OCLC 671710698 Metal Forming. The t.p. reads: METAL FORMING Mechanics and Metallurgy FOURTH EDITION 1. What rule in RDA says to transcribe the title as "Metal Forming : Mechanics and Metallurgy" and not "Metal forming : mechanics and metallurgy" ? Doesn't appendix A4 apply

[RDA-L] Recording series numbering in RDA

OCLC #646122824 Hungarian Americans in the current of history has as a 490 1_ East European monographs ; ‡v DCCLXVI. I presume this is done because of RDA rule 1.8.2, and the alternative chosen by LC which indicates we record the form of the numeral that appears on the piece, whether Arab