On 2013-03-23 05:50, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
In RDA 1.4, we read: "When recording an element listed above as a
supplied element, record the supplied element in the most appropriate
language and script."
We interpret that to mean the language of the text, unless
romanaization
is required b
On 2013-03-22 08:55, Karen Nelson wrote:
I'm playing in my new sandbox and can't figure out why 260 - and not
264 - appears in Toolkit Tools tab under Mapping (RDA to MARC and
MARC
to RDA).
RDA test records exist with 260 because 264 did not exist at that time.
According to PCC new RDA record
On 2012-10-08 00:38, Keith Trickey wrote:
Point of order! "Main entry" was adopted by AACR2 -
Whatever term is used. scholars have been citing sources
by author/title for centuries.
I begain typing "main entry" at the top of a unit card
since the 1940s.
If we wish to :play welll with others",
On 2012-10-07 12:14, Amanda Xu wrote:
In general, editors are considered as compiler. His or her role in
the creation of the intellectual content is compilation, not original
one. That's why title is considered more important than other
controlled access points of a bib.
Here I think we libr
> In despair, before now, trying to find a single term for our opac that would
> cover any of the below PLUS speakers, performers, composers, artists,
> engravers, while having to deal with a character limit for the opac label, I
> have thought of resorting to "Person". But I didn't.
Don't fo
5 matches
Mail list logo
