Karen,
Thanks for your comments. My replies are included:
The practical consideration is not FRBR but is linked data, which FRBR
(or something like it) facilitates. And yes, it is being investigated
in a number of instances, some being the XC project, Open Library,
Freebase. It is also the topic
Quoting Weinheimer Jim :
"That doesn't make sense, *unless the idea is that we must shoehorn
everything into an FRBR world* where everything has all those extra
records for works, expressions and so on. That is an unwarranted
assumption, I believe. The model was never tested for conform
Karen Coyle wrote:
Unfortunately, you, Diane, and Jonathan are not talking about the same
thing. You, Jim, are talking about the rules, and Diane and Jonathan
are talking about the data model. Unfortunately, both ISBD and RDA
describe both data model and the rules for making decisions about the
da
Quoting Weinheimer Jim :
So I still do not understand why we have to have new rules (or new
rule numbers) for determining and inputting the title of a book?
What has changed?
Unfortunately, you, Diane, and Jonathan are not talking about the same
thing. You, Jim, are talking about the r
Diane I. Hillmann wrote:
I think you're right about this, and I think the general habit of
looking at RDA primarily as a set of cataloging rules leads to this
mode of thinking.
Yes, it's the attitude that matters, yet RDA seems to encourage even
more of the latitude that that proved so detr
Diane I. Hillmann wrote:
Jonathan,
I think you're right about this, and I think the general habit of looking at
RDA primarily as a set of cataloging rules leads to this mode
of thinking.
On 8/4/10 10:00 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I would not assume that. One way that the digital world is qu
Jonathan,
I think you're right about this, and I think the general habit of
looking at RDA primarily as a set of cataloging rules leads to this mode
of thinking.
Diane
On 8/4/10 10:00 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Weinheimer Jim wrote:
our patrons want from the records we are to make. T
Weinheimer Jim wrote:
our patrons want from the records we are to make. The digital world is quite different from the printed world, and I think we all still coming to terms with that, including myself. (I am assuming here that there is no need to change substantially any ISBD/AACR2 rules *for phy
Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
Isn't this just as well, if in fact it doesn't live up to being
groundbreaking kind of innovation that would be called for in this day
and age? Instead, it draws out the lines sketched by Cutter already, but
then little more. There's not a word about catalog enrichment,
"Isn't this just as well, if in fact it doesn't live up to being groundbreaking
kind of innovation that would be called for in this day and age? Instead, it
draws out the lines sketched by Cutter already, but then little more. There's
not a word about catalog enrichment, blank chapters about the
Weinheimer Jim wrote:
This first one is, of course, about FRBR and RDA. Listen to it at:
http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/2010/08/cataloging-matters-podcast-1.html
"Cataloging matters" is, in its ambiguity of meaning, probably the best
possible title. Good luck with it!
In this podcas
Apologies for cross-posting
Well, for quite some time I have toyed with the idea of making podcasts and
decided to take the plunge. It's a short one; I still have lots to learn, but
here it is.
This first one is, of course, about FRBR and RDA. Listen to it at:
http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.
12 matches
Mail list logo
