Re: [RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread Arakawa, Steven
Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Don Charuk Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:36 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Content notes We are trying to find the specific r

Re: [RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread Adam L. Schiff
: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:35:49 -0400 From: Don Charuk Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Content notes We are trying to find the specific rule that provides instruction on how to record chapter headings

Re: [RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Don Charuk posted: >We are trying to find the specific rule that provides instruction on how = >to record chapter headings as part of a 505 note. At present, this is more a matter of MARC than of RDA. We find that if we are recording titles beyond the volume or chapter level, i.e. detailed par

Re: [RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread Gene Fieg
f the > Joint Steering Committee. That paper should be posted on or shortly after > Monday, August 5. > > John Attig > former ALA Representative to the JSC > Penn State University > jx...@psu.edu > > -- > > *From: *"Don Charuk" > *To: *RDA-L@LISTSERV.LA

Re: [RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread JOHN C ATTIG
: "Don Charuk" | To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA | Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:35:49 AM | Subject: [RDA-L] Content notes | We are trying to find the specific rule that provides instruction on | how to record chapter headings as part of a 505 note. (Cataloguers | want/demand specifi

[RDA-L] Content notes

2013-07-31 Thread Don Charuk
We are trying to find the specific rule that provides instruction on how to record chapter headings as part of a 505 note. (Cataloguers want/demand specific rule numbers) We are certain it does not fall under Chapters 25, 26 and 27. We are to presume it comes under rule 7.10. but, this rule seem