Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies

2013-08-06 Thread Arakawa, Steven
:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 6:17 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies I think it would be better to get all thought of "main entry" ou

Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies

2013-08-05 Thread Kevin M Randall
lto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 4:28 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate > bodies > > A question on relationship designators and corporate

Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies

2013-08-05 Thread Arakawa, Steven
13 2:54 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies What about liturgical works? The main entry (i.e., the name in a name-title AAP) is the associated church or denomination, but this is nevertheless categorised as 'other c

Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corporate bodies

2013-08-05 Thread Bernadette Mary O'Reilly
What about liturgical works? The main entry (i.e., the name in a name-title AAP) is the associated church or denomination, but this is nevertheless categorised as 'other corporate body associated with the work', in which case 'issuing body' is correct. 'issuing body' could also be used as a secon