Hi all,
I have questions about the correct use of the relationship designators,
issuing body and author, especially for corporate bodies.
If a corporate body is considered the creator of a work (per RDA 19.2.1.1.1)
and is recorded in the 110 of a bibliographic record, would you use the
) wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:00:50 +
From: Crum, Cathy (KDLA) cathy.c...@ky.gov
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for corportate
] Correct use of relationship designators for corportate bodies
Hi all,
I have questions about the correct use of the relationship designators,
issuing body and author, especially for corporate bodies.
If a corporate body is considered the creator of a work (per RDA 19.2.1.1.1
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 10:16 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Correct use of relationship designators for
corportate bodies
In answer to the first question, author is probably the most likely
Cathy Crum asked:
I have questions about the correct use of the relationship designators, is=
suing body and author, especially for corporate bodies.
We would limit the use of author with a corporate body, to resources
entered under the corporate body, i.e., administrative resources about
the
.
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:15:26 -0700
From: J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Correct use
6 matches
Mail list logo