ginal Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:23 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation
De
Deborah:
See 6.27.4.1
Construct additional variant access points if considered important for
access.
Fast, Howard, 1914-2003. Sylvia
Authorized access point for the work: Cunningham, E. V., 1914-2003.
Sylvia.
Novel originally published under the pseudonym E.V. Cunningham; authors
real name
I am probably just missing it, but I cannot find the RDA instruction that
tells us to make a Variant Access Point using the other name used in
association with a work; i.e., where does it say *in RDA* to make the 400,
in the Authority Record example that Adam sent:
-
A real life exampl
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Santos Muñoz,
> Ricardo
> Sent: February-28-13 6:56 AM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multipl
cess / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] En nombre de J. McRee Elrod
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de febrero de 2013 2:55
Para: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Asunto: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation
Kevinn asked:
>So are you actually c
Kevinn asked:
>So are you actually considering the two different manifestations of
>"Exit to Eden" as distinct WORKS?
No. It is a matter of legacy records differing from current records,
since LC rarely changes records retrospectively, nor can we since the
records have already been sent to cl
Mac Elrod wrote:
> We would enter under the later name, but have a note (503, but 500 for
> those of you who accept that bad MARBI decision) saying the ealier
> edition was published under the earlier name. We would Cutter the
> editions to stand together.
>
> Adam cited Ann Rampling/Ann Rice.
>
V.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation
Lori asked:
>Which name should be in the 100 field? Should both names be included as
>access points?
I don't think you should have two access points for the samer person; that is
what cross references are
Lori asked:
>Which name should be in the 100 field? Should both names be included
>as access points?
I don't think you should have two access points for the samer person;
that is what cross references are for.
We would enter under the later name, but have a note (503, but 500 for
those of you w
Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:50 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation
The relevant RDA instruction is 6.27.1.7 Different Identities for an Individual
Responsible for a Work.
If:
an individual
I didn't answer Lori's specific questions when I cited the relevant RDA
instruction.
The name in the 100 should be whichever one is the result from applying
6.27.1.7. The other name should NOT be included as an access point,
because, at least in theory, the authority record for the work would
The relevant RDA instruction is 6.27.1.7 Different Identities for an
Individual Responsible for a Work.
If:
an individual responsible for a work has more than one identity (see
9.2.2.8)
and
there is no consistency in how that individual is identified on resources
embodying the work
then:
Hi there,
I have in hand an item that I'm not quite sure how to treat under RDA. It was
originally published under a pseudonym which the author only used for the
series that it was a part of. The series is now being republished under the
author's current pen name, with the statement on the titl
13 matches
Mail list logo
