/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
Sent: October 17, 2012 9:08 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
My understanding is that 100/700 field itself indicates creator/co
My understanding is that 100/700 field itself indicates
creator/contributorrelationship of a person/family/corporate body with
the resource. So we do
not have to put creator/contributor as a relationship designator. They are
umbrella terms to cover various specific relationships like author or
illu
On 16/10/2012 23:04, Deborah Fritz wrote:
> Putting all the legacy MARC records out of our mind, it is **really**
> important to record this information, if you want to be able to,
> someday, reliably machine map the data in the new RDA/MARC records you
> are creating into a new encoding format th
n and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 3:19 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
Bob,
I agree with you that we *should* be able to add 'creator'
Robert Maxwell said:
>I don't think I agree with this as an argument for not including high
>level general terms in the relationship terms available ...
SLC agrees with Robert.
It i still on open question whether SLC will use relationship
designators; only one client so far has said they want th
ofquality.com
www.marcofquality.com
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:34 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Questi
day, October 17, 2012 9:45 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
The designator codes are not mandatory across the board, but certain values are
considered core values under certain institutional policies for certain
resou
rprise Systems MIT Libraries
617-253-7137
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:57 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question
-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
But is the subfield e relationship designator mandatory or optional, for the
1xx field, for the 7xx field?
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> "Brenndorfer, Thomas"
>>> mailto:tbrenndor...@li
s / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jack Wu
Sent: October 16, 2012 3:54 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for
contributors
Some rather basic questions I'm still ignorant of. Is it all
ce Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:27 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
Here's a simple chart:
designators.
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jack Wu
Sent: October 16, 2012 3:54 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship t
Some rather basic questions I'm still ignorant of. Is it allowable to have some
access points with the relationship designator and some without any
relationship designator? And are the terms of creator and author mutually
exclusive.
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
d"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:13 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L]
ehalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:57 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
The principal drawback I see to using ad-hoc terms is that they necessarily fall outside any structure relating terms in a hierarchical
ies
617-253-7137
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:57 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Benjamin A Abrahamse
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:00 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
Thanks for the replies and suggestions.
--Ben
Be
scription and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:57 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
The LC-PCC Policy Statement fo
-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:57 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Question about relationship terms for contributors
The LC-PCC Policy Statement for K.1 says "Use only terms from Appendix K if
supplying relationship designators i
The LC-PCC Policy Statement for K.1 says "Use only terms from Appendix K
if supplying relationship designators in the shared LC/NACO Authority
File. Do not supply terms beyond those found in this Appendix."
But there is no similar restriction in the LC-PCC PS for J.1 or I.1, so it
would appear t
Hi,
These are general guidelines for using relationship designators.
General Guidelines on Using Relationship Designators
- Use relationship designators to indicate the specific nature of
relationships between a resource and persons, families, and corporate
bodies associated with that
If we are cataloging a work, with a preface by someone other than the main
author, RDA 20.2.1 says this is a relationship between a person and an
expression.
The examples in RDA 20 list this as "Writer of Added Commentary, Etc." In
Appendix I.3, "Relationship Designators for Persons, Families,
22 matches
Mail list logo
