Kevin said:
>It might be hard to remember since it ended some time ago, but AACR2 was un=
>der continual revision after it was published.
There were, however, far fewer changes due to not being able to
understand what the text was saying.
It was not long ago for me, but midway through my catal
Fairmount St.
Wichita, KS 67260-0068
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:15 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA--How dynamic is it?
It
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:15 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA--How dynamic is it?
It might be hard to remember since it ended some time ago, but AACR2 was under
@northwestern.edu>
(847) 491-2939
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:31 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject
That is the thing bothering me. I cited RDA rules in my training materials.
But once I go back, there are some changes. I cannot see when I can truly
end my work :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Gene Fieg wrote:
> With all these discussions and proposals about RDA being submitted, how
> dyna
With all these discussions and proposals about RDA being submitted, how
dynamic is RDA? Is it still a code in process of becoming?
How can we call it a cataloging code, when the code keeps changing, almost
daily?
--
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.ed
6 matches
Mail list logo