> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: May-07-13 3:46 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/t
The relator codes existed long before RDA and are not specific to RDA.
"aus" means Author of screenplay. The codes are not intended to be
understood as is by patrons, any more than fixed field data. In theory they
can displayed (or not) however your institution wishes in the catalog, or
used for fa
Kevin answered me:
>> By definition isn't any person, body, or family in 1XX a creator?
>
>No, the entity in the 1XX field may be an "Other Person, Family, or
.Corporate Body Associated with a Work"
Why is this not also true of 700 in a 700 12 $a$t? The 700 being
assumed to be creator was the
Just a question here. Are these relator codes mandatory in RDA?
I hope not. Just ran across one for dramatist, Tony Kushner, that had the
relator, "aus"
Is a patron going to instinctively know what that means? I have yet to
look it up. I think it means author of script.
Have we substituted one
Mac Elrod wrote:
> By definition isn't any person, body, or family in 1XX a creator?
No, the entity in the 1XX field may be an "Other Person, Family, or Corporate
Body Associated with a Work" (RDA 19.3). Most of these seem to be legal works
or religious works.
> For systems which list the 700
LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?
That depends on whether 'The director's event' is to be considered a
compilation of works by different persons, etc. (6.27.1.4) or a
collaborative work (6.27.1.3). I think it's the latter, s
That depends on whether 'The director's event' is to be considered a
compilation of works by different persons, etc. (6.27.1.4) or a collaborative
work (6.27.1.3). I think it's the latter, so the first-named of those creators
would be used in the AAP.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: May-06-13 1:12 AM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/t
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: 06 May 2013 06:12
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?
John said:
>No, because
John said:
>No, because there is no instruction for including relationship
>designators in authorized access points for works and expressions.
>In any case, any name that is included in such an AAP is by
>definition some kind of creator or one of the categories from 19.3.
By definition isn't an
)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of J. McRee Elrod [m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 16:32
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?
Will we be including
Will we be including relator codes or terms in author/title added
entries, e.g.,
700 12 $aJones, Jim.$4aut$tPaper title.
or
00 12 $aJones, Jim,$eauthor$tPaper title.
Why or why not?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP:/
12 matches
Mail list logo
