Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-12 Thread Jack Wu
All new RDA records should have 264 fields not 260; RDA created during test may have either or both fields; AACR2 legacy mostly have only 260. This is all very accommodating, but where is the uniformity of practice? Does it not complicate indexing or conversion? RDA, LC, PCC, OCLC seem not to ha

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-12 Thread Reser, Dave
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:42 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher What Robert said is true, but there is an LCPS for 2.8.1.4 that says: LC practice for Optional

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Pam Withrow asked: >RDA Toolkit says this information goes in the 260 field, but this isn't the >first time I've seen the 264 field used. Could someone please clarify? According to PCC, all new RDA records should have 264, not 260; field 264 had not been extablished during the test period. Sinc

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Dr. Robert Ellett
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Snow, Karen wrote: > Thank you so much, Robert! (and everyone else who responded to my email). > I noticed that option at 2.8.1.4, but didn't connect the dots to what I was > doing. Since Vintage Departures is a series statement (thanks John Hostage) > and I have

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Adam L. Schiff
What Robert said is true, but there is an LCPS for 2.8.1.4 that says: LC practice for Optional omission: Generally do not omit levels in corporate hierarchy. So LC catalogers will generally transcribe the publisher statement as found in a resource. The PCC practice for this omission has not

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Snow, Karen
-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Snow, Karen mailto:ks...@dom.edu>> wrote: I am trying to determine what to transcribe in 264$b for the following publication information (on the title page of the work): Vinta

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Adam L. Schiff
My comments interspersed below. --Adam On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Buzz Haughton wrote: Hello, Pamela! LC announced the implementation of the 264 MARC field in June. The last time I looked, OCLC still had nothing about it, but you can get the basic layout at: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Dr. Robert Ellett
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Snow, Karen wrote: > I am trying to determine what to transcribe in 264$b for the following > publication information (on the title page of the work): > Vintage Departures > Vintage Books > A Division of Random House, Inc. > New York > > Hi Karen It is my underst

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Guy Vernon Frost
PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher Hello, Pamela! LC announced the implementation of the 264 MARC field in June. The last time I looked, OCLC still had nothing about it, but you can get the basic layout at: http://www.loc.go

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Buzz Haughton
Hello, Pamela! LC announced the implementation of the 264 MARC field in June. The last time I looked, OCLC still had nothing about it, but you can get the basic layout at: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd264.html 264 requires a second indicator, usually #1 (publication) and/or #4 (copyri

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread John Hostage
GC.CA > Subject: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher > > I am trying to determine what to transcribe in 264$b for the following > publication information (on the title page of the work): > Vintage Departures > Vintage Books > A Division of Random House, Inc. > N

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Pam Withrow
RDA Toolkit says this information goes in the 260 field, but this isn't the first time I've seen the 264 field used. Could someone please clarify? Thanks, Pamela Withrow Cataloger Perma-Bound Books Jacksonville, IL 62650 On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Snow, Karen wrote: > I am trying to det

Re: [RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Joan Wang
I would transcribe it as: New York : Vintage Books. Vintage Books is an established corporate body name. "Vintage Departures" seems to be something else instead of the corporate body name. Thanks, Joan Wang Illinois Heartland Library System On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Snow, Karen wrote:

[RDA-L] Transcription of more than one publisher

2012-09-11 Thread Snow, Karen
I am trying to determine what to transcribe in 264$b for the following publication information (on the title page of the work): Vintage Departures Vintage Books A Division of Random House, Inc. New York (Note: "Vintage Departures" is printed using slightly larger font than the other names and Ne