Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-03-01 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Yuji posted: >I initially also thought that "contained in (work)" could be used in >this situation. But the more I thought about it, the more confusing it >became ... Our clients have rejected 7XX$i even more strongly than 1XX/7XX $e, perhaps because $i comes at the beginning of the field? Hav

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-03-01 Thread Diane Hillmann
847) 491-2939 >> >> Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978! >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access >> > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Yuji Tosaka >> > Sent:

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-03-01 Thread Kevin M Randall
> -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Yuji Tosaka > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:03 AM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] relationship

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-03-01 Thread Yuji Tosaka
I initially also thought that "contained in (work)" could be used in this situation. But the more I thought about it, the more confusing it became, since it seems that the compilation in question must be a component part of the serial if the RDA relationship designator "contained in (work)" can

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-02-28 Thread M. E.
J. McRee Elrod wrote: > Todaka said: > >>We are working on an RDA record for a compilation of columns selected >>from the Science Scope journal. We wanted to provide an access point >>for Science Scope in 730 field. > > The recently added $4prv Provider seems right to me. If the journal > also pu

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-02-19 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Todaka said: >We are working on an RDA record for a compilation of columns selected >from the Science Scope journal. We wanted to provide an access point >for Science Scope in 730 field. The recently added $4prv Provider seems right to me. If the journal also published the collection, you could

[RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-02-19 Thread Yuji Tosaka
We are working on an RDA record for a compilation of columns selected from the Science Scope journal. We wanted to provide an access point for Science Scope in 730 field. Here, columns are in whole-part relationships with the two aggregate works [i.e., contained in (work)/contains (work)], but