[rdiff-backup-users] Re: new windows version

2005-09-29 Thread Chinook
David Kempe wrote: Chinook wrote: I've since got waylaid on an ObjC task, but at the time I noted that I have Apple's version of "xattr" as well as Apple's Carbon ACL modules. In the ACL modules it specifically notes that some are non-portable. Do you have any

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: new windows version

2005-09-28 Thread Chinook
Dave Kempe wrote: Hi, fsyncing problems notwithstanding, rdiff-backup for windows 1.0.1 is now available. it seems to work as well as the last versions :) http://solutionsfirst.com.au/~dave/backup/rdiff-backup1.0.1w4.exe let me know if there are any fixes needed. I did see someone had writte

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: getting oriented questions

2005-09-18 Thread Chinook
Ben Escoto wrote: Chinook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:38:49 -0400 I would like to checkout rdiff-backup usage on Mac OS X (10.4.2) 1) Are there any other such users out there? Well not me but I think there are some :) 2)

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: getting oriented questions

2005-09-17 Thread Chinook
Ok, lets take a different shot at this :-) I would like to checkout rdiff-backup usage on Mac OS X (10.4.2) 1) Are there any other such users out there? 2) I want to use the full functionality but there are two limitations, namely ACLs and EAs. The various port packages have "librsync" incl

[rdiff-backup-users] getting oriented questions

2005-09-16 Thread Chinook
getting oriented questions **dual 2.5 PM G5 running Tiger (10.4.2)** I'm just getting into rdiff-backup so if these questions are to simple please just point me in the right direction :-) I'm working on an ongoing (wip) article href="http://homepage.mac.com/lee_cullens/Bx3.html";>Backup::Resto