Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-08-12 Thread micah
* dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070810 08:44]: On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, micah wrote: This time Debian stable (etch) has the rdiff-backup stable version 1.1.5, and 1.1.5 is not a *stable* version, it's an *unstable* version. My mistake, I misread the website version 1.0.5 as 1.1.5. Micah

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-08-10 Thread dean gaudet
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, micah wrote: This time Debian stable (etch) has the rdiff-backup stable version 1.1.5, and 1.1.5 is not a *stable* version, it's an *unstable* version. http://www.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup/ -dean ___ rdiff-backup-users mailing

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-08-04 Thread Neil Van Dyke
I'm a user of the Debian packagings of rdiff-backup, and have been bit hard as a result of Debian's version choices and the non-backward-compatible protocol changes between 1.1.5 and 1.1.12. Currently, Debian stable contains a development version of rdiff-backup (which in hindsight seems to

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-08-03 Thread Neil Van Dyke
I'm a user of the Debian packagings of rdiff-backup, and have been bit hard as a result of Debian's version choices and the non-backward-compatible protocol changes between 1.1.5 and 1.1.12. Currently, Debian stable contains a development version of rdiff-backup (which in hindsight seems to have

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-08-03 Thread Steven Willoughby
Neil Van Dyke wrote: I'm a user of the Debian packagings of rdiff-backup, and have been bit hard as a result of Debian's version choices and the non-backward-compatible protocol changes between 1.1.5 and 1.1.12. Currently, Debian stable contains a development version of rdiff-backup (which in

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-30 Thread Gavin
Hi Gents, I really feel the best place for the latest version .deb is backports.org, if intended/compatible with debian stable. Cheers Gavin Dave Kempe wrote: micah wrote: The one downside that maybe wasn't accounted for is that this breaks rdiff-backup between Debian stable and both

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-29 Thread micah
* Dave Kempe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070728 16:32]: micah wrote: The one downside that maybe wasn't accounted for is that this breaks rdiff-backup between Debian stable and both Debian testing and unstable. This means that to backup a Debian stable system with rdiff-backup, one needs to backup

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-28 Thread micah
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:45 -0400, Andrew Ferguson wrote: Marcelo Diotto wrote: But i always get this error: Exception 'too many values to unpack' raised of class You are not using the same version of rdiff-backup on both sides. An important change was made to the network protocol in

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-28 Thread Andrew Ferguson
micah wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:45 -0400, Andrew Ferguson wrote: Marcelo Diotto wrote: But i always get this error: Exception 'too many values to unpack' raised of class You are not using the same version of rdiff-backup on both sides. An important change was made to the

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-28 Thread micah
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:52:01 -0400, Andrew Ferguson wrote: micah wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:45 -0400, Andrew Ferguson wrote: Marcelo Diotto wrote: But i always get this error: Exception 'too many values to unpack' raised of class You are not using the same version of

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Error: Too Many values to unpack

2007-07-28 Thread Dave Kempe
micah wrote: The one downside that maybe wasn't accounted for is that this breaks rdiff-backup between Debian stable and both Debian testing and unstable. This means that to backup a Debian stable system with rdiff-backup, one needs to backup to another stable system, whereas before this