Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-08 Thread Jason Szumlanski
Oh, yes - that is a great application for the MNPV-AC. I didn't mean to imply there isn't a good use for them. In this particular instance the three MVPV-AC's are really subcombiners that get all get tied together in another subpanel at ground level. They really were not necessary, but made it

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-08 Thread jay peltz
Hi jason, 3 questions, I can't find the MNPV-AC in midnites price list, is this something custom or just new? And if you don't need breakers why not just do a junction box on the roof. and the inspectors I've had have requested a disconnecting means on the roof or visible from the roof. So

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-08 Thread Kent Osterberg
Jason, It seems to me that two of the exceptions in 240.24 may apply to your situation. Most significantly (4) For overcurrent devices adjacent to utilization equipment that they supply, access shall be permitted to be by portable means. Thus using a latter to access the ac combiner on the

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-08 Thread Jason Szumlanski
Yeah, normally it would have been our practice to use a j-box and bring down three strings. In this case it made more sense to combine strings on the roof and just bring down a single circuit in a single conduit. Long story... long wire run... probably bad planning in hindsight. The MNPV6-AC is a

[RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-07 Thread Jason Szumlanski
While I haven't completely convinced the latest inspector about PV not being mechanical equipment, I'm running into another issue. I decided to try out the new Midnite MNPV6-AC combiner for Enphase circuits. Because there are overcurrent devices inside, the inspector now insists that NEC

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-07 Thread jay peltz
I'm with your inspector on this. I don't install fuses or breakers on roofs jay peltz power On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Jason Szumlanski wrote: While I haven't completely convinced the latest inspector about PV not being mechanical equipment, I'm running into another issue. I decided

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-07 Thread Jason Szumlanski
Jay, I assume you mean pitched roofs, or not readily accessible flat roofs. This particular project happens to be a flat commercial roof, but with no permanent ladder or hatch. I really didn't have to use the MNPV6-AC's, but it made sense in this case (excluding the access issue). Looks like my

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-07 Thread Dan Fink
Might be a good application for the Midnite Disconnecting Combiners, with the control unit on the ground. -- Dan Fink, Executive Director; Otherpower Buckville Energy Consulting Buckville Publications LLC NABCEP / IREC accredited Continuing Education Providers 970.672.4342 (voicemail) On Thu,

Re: [RE-wrenches] Accessibility of Equipment on Roof was Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?

2013-02-07 Thread jay peltz
Hi Jason, Is it possible to install them on the side of a building? And Dan's suggestion for the remote midnite might be perfect. jay On Feb 7, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Jason Szumlanski wrote: Jay, I assume you mean pitched roofs, or not readily accessible flat roofs. This particular project